Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
A cohort study exploring determinants of safety-related regulatory actions for biopharmaceuticals
Hans C Ebbers1, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Ellen H M Moors
1Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences-UIPS, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Background:
The characteristics of biopharmaceuticals may require a tailored approach to their safety management. However, information on what tools and methods are employed to assess the safety of biopharmaceuticals post-authorization is lacking.
Objective:
This study investigates determinants that contribute to the post-authorization management of biopharmaceuticals.
Methods:
A cohort study was performed including all centrally approved biopharmaceuticals for which a Direct Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) was issued during 1997-2009. Safety-related regulatory actions were defined as updates of the summary of product characteristics through type II variations. Determinants of these actions were identified based on publicly available data. Urgent variations, defined as variations accompanied by a DHPC, were compared with other, 'non-urgent', safety-related variations.
Results:
We identified 133 variations relating to 15 products, 24 urgent and 109 other variations. For 55% of urgent variations, spontaneous reports were the sole source of regulatory action, post-approval studies accounted for 33%, and 12% were based on other sources or combinations of sources. For the non-urgent variations, spontaneous reports were the sole source for 36%, post-approval studies for 28%, and 36% were based on other sources or combinations. Overall, most variations included safety issues categorized as 'infections and infestations' (33.1%), 'general disorders and administration site conditions' (25.6%), and 'neoplasms' (14.3%).
Conclusion:
Determinants of urgent and non-urgent safety-related regulatory actions of biopharmaceuticals are largely similar. Spontaneous reports are an important pillar for both urgent and non-urgent actions and remain an important tool in the post-authorization safety management of biopharmaceuticals.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Regulation
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
