Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
Published on: May 12, 2023
[Do critical pathways improve outcomes of patients with cardiac failure?]
Antonietta Barbieri1, Erika Milan, Maria Grazia Cattaneo
1SC Qualità e Appropriatezza Prescrittiva - Presidio Ospedaliero S. Andrea ASL VC, Vercelli. antonella.barbieri@aslvc.piemonte.it
Insights
Critical pathways significantly reduce mortality and hospital stays for cardiac failure patients. This meta-analysis shows improved outcomes and lower costs compared to standard care, enhancing patient management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Cardiac failure is a growing public health concern with increasing incidence and prevalence.
- Despite advances, effective management strategies for cardiac failure are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of critical pathways versus standard care in managing cardiac failure patients.
- To assess critical pathways' effects on mortality, hospital stay, costs, and readmissions.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of eleven studies involving 5,460 patients.
- Databases searched: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane.
- Study quality assessed using Jadad method and New Castle Ottawa Scale.
Main Results:
- Critical pathways led to lower hospital and six-month mortality rates.
- Significant improvements observed in reduced length of hospital stay and direct costs.
- Lower readmission rates at one, three, and six months were associated with critical pathways.
Conclusions:
- Critical pathways enhance the quality of care for cardiac failure patients.
- Further research is recommended to identify specific mechanisms within care pathways that drive these improvements.
Unlabelled:
Cardiac failure represents an important public health problem and despite recent clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic advances, the incidence and prevalence of this syndrome show a steady increase. In view of this, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of critical pathways in the management of patients with cardiac failure when compared with standard care. The impact of critical pathways on the following outcomes were evaluated: hospital mortality, mortality at six months, mean length of hospital stay, direct costs, readmission rates at one, three and six months.
Methods:
The following databases were consulted: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The research was limited to articles published between January 1975 and June 2010. Methodological quality of studies was evaluated by the Jadad method (for RCTs, cRCT, CCT) and the New Castle Ottawa Scale for case-control and cohort studies. Data analysis was performed by using the statistical methods described in the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan software version 5.
Results:
Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis (5,460 patients). A lower mortality (hospital mortality and mortality at 6 months) was observed in the critical pathways group compared to the group treated with standard care. A positive impact of critical pathways was also observed in length of stay, direct costs, readmission after one, three and six months.
Conclusions:
Critical pathways can improve the quality of care provided to patients with cardiac failure. Further studies are needed to evaluate which mechanisms within the care pathways can truly improve the quality of care.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy