Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP02:36

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP

Chromatin immunoprecipitation, or ChIP, is an antibody-based technique used to identify sites on DNA that bind to transcription factors of interest or histone proteins. It also helps determine the type of histone modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, or methylation.
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications02:25

Spreading of Chromatin Modifications

The histone proteins in the nucleosomes are post-translationally modified (PTM) to increase or decrease access to DNA. The commonly observed PTMs are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination of lysine amino acids in the histone H3 tail region. These histone modifications have specific meaning for the cell. Hence, they are called "histone code". The protein complex involved in histone modification is termed as "reader-writer" complex.
Writers
The writer is an enzyme that can...
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures03:17

Inheritance of Chromatin Structures

Epigenetics is the study of inherited changes in a cell's phenotype without changing the DNA sequences. It provides a form of memory for the differential gene expression pattern to maintain cell lineage, position-effect variegation, dosage compensation, and maintenance of chromatin structures such as telomeres and centromeres. For example, the structure and location of the centromere on chromosomes are epigenetically inherited. Its functionality is not dictated or ensured by the underlying DNA...
Heterochromatin02:38

Heterochromatin

The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions that take up more dye are called heterochromatin. Heterochromatin is further classified into two forms – constitutive heterochromatin and facultative heterochromatin.
Constitutive heterochromatin: It is a highly compact region of chromatin that is mostly concentrated in the centromere and telomere. Unlike euchromatin, the amino acid at 9th...
Nucleosome Remodeling02:54

Nucleosome Remodeling

Nucleosomes are the basic units of chromatin compaction. Each nucleosome consists of the DNA bound tightly around a histone core, which makes the DNA inaccessible to DNA binding proteins such as DNA polymerase and RNA polymerase. Hence, the fundamental problem is to ensure access to DNA when appropriate, despite the compact and protective chromatin structure.
Nucleosome remodeling complex
Eukaryotic cells have specialized enzymes called ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling enzymes. These enzymes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ESR1 mutations and CDK4/6 inhibitor choice shape clonal selection and adaptive cell states during acquired resistance.

Genome medicine·2026
Same author

CistromeMeta: a large language model powered tool for automated ChIP-seq metadata extraction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Epigenetic subtypes of high-grade T1 bladder cancer reveal intra-tumor heterogeneity and distinct interactions with tumor microenvironment.

Theranostics·2026
Same author

Advancing regenerative medicine with RNA nanotechnology for chronic and end organ diseases.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

A pan-cancer compendium of 1,294 plasma cell-free DNA methylomes and fragmentomes enabling multicancer detection.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

METTL3-based epitranscriptomic editing screening identifies functional m<sup>6</sup>A sites in cancers.

Nature cancer·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

RNA-Associated Chromatin DNA-DNA Interaction Method
11:01

RNA-Associated Chromatin DNA-DNA Interaction Method

Published on: April 30, 2026

Differential DNase I hypersensitivity reveals factor-dependent chromatin dynamics.

Housheng Hansen He1, Clifford A Meyer, Mei Wei Chen

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;

Genome Research
|April 18, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Hormone-induced changes in DNA hypersensitivity predict androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) binding sites. This dynamic chromatin accessibility offers a general method for identifying cell-type specific transcription factor binding locations.

More Related Videos

Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis
09:26

Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2021

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue
13:47

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue

Published on: March 23, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

RNA-Associated Chromatin DNA-DNA Interaction Method
11:01

RNA-Associated Chromatin DNA-DNA Interaction Method

Published on: April 30, 2026

Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis
09:26

Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2021

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue
13:47

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue

Published on: March 23, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Epigenetics

Background:

  • Transcription factor cistromes are crucial for cell-type specificity.
  • Chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, and nucleosome occupancy influence transcription factor binding.
  • Understanding these factors is key to deciphering gene regulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predictive power of hormone-induced DNase I hypersensitivity changes (ΔDHS) for androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) binding.
  • To compare the chromatin interaction modes of AR and ESR1.
  • To establish ΔDHS as a general method for predicting cell-type specific cistromes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of hormone-induced DNase I hypersensitivity (DHS) changes.
  • Correlation of ΔDHS with AR and ESR1 binding sites in cancer cells.
  • Assessment of nucleosome occupancy dynamics in relation to receptor binding.

Main Results:

  • ΔDHS strongly predicts AR and ESR1 binding in prostate and breast cancer cells, respectively.
  • AR binding correlates with changes in local nucleosome occupancy and DNase I hypersensitivity.
  • Global ESR1 binding is independent of nucleosome occupancy changes, but DHS dynamics predict its cistrome.

Conclusions:

  • AR and ESR1 exhibit distinct chromatin interaction mechanisms.
  • DNase I hypersensitivity dynamics serve as a robust predictor of cell-type specific cistromes for both receptors.
  • This approach offers a generalized strategy for mapping transcription factor binding.