Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
Plasma substitutes therapy in pediatrics
Domenico Pietrini1, Daniele De Luca, Federica Tosi
1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital “A.Gemelli”, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Rome, Italy. d.pietrini@rm.unicatt.it
Insights
Hypovolemia in children requires careful fluid resuscitation. This review examines synthetic and non-synthetic colloids, comparing their pharmacodynamics for treating critical blood loss in pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Pharmacology
- Fluid resuscitation
Background:
- Hypovolemia is a leading cause of circulatory failure in children, potentially leading to organ damage.
- Fluid administration is a common intervention for hemorrhagic shock, but fluid type choice remains debated in pediatrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the pharmacodynamics of synthetic and non-synthetic colloids used in pediatric fluid resuscitation.
- To address controversies surrounding colloid use in children experiencing critical blood loss.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on pharmacodynamics of various fluid resuscitation agents.
- Analysis of studies comparing crystalloids, albumin, gelatins, and hydroxyethylstarch (HES) in pediatric populations.
Main Results:
- Crystalloids are cost-effective but offer less sustained volume expansion and are linked to adverse effects like edema.
- Colloids, including gelatins and HES, provide more sustained intravascular volume, but pediatric data on HES efficacy and safety is limited.
Conclusions:
- The choice of fluid resuscitation in pediatric hypovolemia impacts patient outcomes.
- Further pediatric-specific research is needed to clarify the optimal use and safety of different colloid solutions.
Abstract:
Hypovolemia is the most common cause of circulatory failure in children and may lead to critical tissue perfusion and eventually multiple-organ failure. Administration of fluids to maintain or restore intravascular volume represents a common intervention after hemorrhagic shock occurring during surgical procedures or in patients with trauma. Notwithstanding, there is uncertainty whether the type of fluid may significantly influence the outcome, especially in pediatrics. Both human albumin and crystalloids are usually administered: the advantages of crystalloids include low cost, lack of effect on coagulation, no risk of anaphylactic reaction or transmission of infectious agents. However, large amount of crystalloid infusion has been correlated with pulmonary oedema, bilateral pleural effusions, intestinal intussusception, excessive bowel edema, impairing closure of surgical wounds and peripheral edema. Moreover, intravascular volume expansion obtained by crystalloids is known to be significantly shorter and less efficacious than colloids. Among synthetic colloids, gelatins have been used for many years in children, also in early infancy, to treat intravascular fluid deficits. Hydroxyethylstarch (HES) preparations have been introduced recently, becoming very popular for vascular loading both in adults and children. However, the number of pediatric studies aimed at evaluating HES efficacy and tolerance is limited. Given the ongoing controversies on the use of colloids in childhood, this review will focus on the pharmacodynamics of synthetic and non synthetic colloids for the treatment of critical blood loss in pediatrics.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

