Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Biomechanical rationale for six splinted implants in bilateral canine, premolar, and molar regions in an edentulous
Masashi Sano1, Kazunori Ikebe, Tsung-Chieh Yang
1Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan.
Purpose:
To determine the influence of number and location of implants loaded on the stress to the bone in an edentulous maxilla using a three-dimensional finite element model (3D FEM).
Material And Methods:
Computed tomographic data with the bone density of a dry skull were used to construct a 3D FEM. Titanium implants were simulated in the configuration as 14 unsplinted implants (US14), 14 splinted implants (S14), 6 splinted implants (canine, premolar, and molar regions, S6), 4 splinted implants (S4), and 6 anterior implants (incisors and canines, A6). Distributed loads of 200 N were applied on the occlusal table of the superstructures.
Results:
The S6 model was subjected to a similar amount of stress and deformation to the US14 and the S14. The S4 and A6 models were subjected to approximately three times of stress under the vertical load, and approximately five times of stress under the inclined load, respectively, compared with the S6 model.
Conclusions:
The 3D FEM analyses suggest that the six splinted implants configuration has a similar stress and deformation pattern as compared with naturally positioned splinted 14 implants in the edentulous maxilla.