MS4A1 dysregulation in asbestos-related lung squamous cell carcinoma is due to CD20 stromal lymphocyte expression
Casey M Wright1, Santiyagu M Savarimuthu Francis, Maxine E Tan
1School of Medicine, The University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Queensland, Australia. casey.wright@uqconnect.edu.au
Abstract:
Asbestos-related lung cancer accounts for 4-12% of lung cancers worldwide. We have previously identified ADAM28 as a putative oncogene involved in asbestos-related lung adenocarcinoma (ARLC-AC). We hypothesised that similarly gene expression profiling of asbestos-related lung squamous cell carcinomas (ARLC-SCC) may identify candidate oncogenes for ARLC-SCC. We undertook a microarray gene expression study in 56 subjects; 26 ARLC-SCC (defined as lung asbestos body (AB) counts >20AB/gram wet weight (gww) and 30 non-asbestos related lung squamous cell carcinoma (NARLC-SCC; no detectable lung asbestos bodies; 0AB/gww). Microarray and bioinformatics analysis identified six candidate genes differentially expressed between ARLC-SCC and NARLC-SCC based on statistical significance (p<0.001) and fold change (FC) of >2-fold. Two genes MS4A1 and CARD18, were technically replicated by qRT-PCR and showed consistent directional changes. As we also found MS4A1 to be overexpressed in ARLC-ACs, we selected this gene for biological validation in independent test sets (one internal, and one external dataset (2 primary tumor sets)). MS4A1 RNA expression dysregulation was validated in the external dataset but not in our internal dataset, likely due to the small sample size in the test set as immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for MS4A1 (CD20) showed that protein expression localized predominantly to stromal lymphocytes rather than tumor cells in ARLC-SCC. We conclude that differential expression of MS4A1 in this comparative gene expression study of ARLC-SCC versus NARLC-SCC is a stromal signal of uncertain significance, and an example of the rationale for tumor cell enrichment in preparation for gene expression studies where the aim is to identify markers of particular tumor phenotypes. Finally, our study failed to identify any strong gene candidates whose expression serves as a marker of asbestos etiology. Future research is required to determine the role of stromal lymphocyte MS4A1 dysregulation in pulmonary SCCs caused by asbestos.
Insights
This study investigated gene expression in asbestos-related lung squamous cell carcinoma (ARLC-SCC). Researchers identified MS4A1 as a potential marker, but found its expression was mainly in stromal lymphocytes, not tumor cells, indicating uncertain significance for asbestos etiology.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Environmental Health
Background:
- Asbestos-related lung cancer represents a significant global health burden.
- Previous research identified ADAM28 as a potential oncogene in asbestos-related lung adenocarcinoma (ARLC-AC).
- The genetic markers for asbestos-related lung squamous cell carcinoma (ARLC-SCC) remain largely undetermined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify candidate oncogenes in ARLC-SCC through gene expression profiling.
- To compare gene expression between ARLC-SCC and non-asbestos-related lung squamous cell carcinoma (NARLC-SCC).
- To validate potential candidate genes, specifically MS4A1, in independent datasets.
Main Methods:
- Microarray gene expression analysis was performed on 56 subjects (26 ARLC-SCC and 30 NARLC-SCC).
- Bioinformatics analysis identified differentially expressed genes with statistical significance (p<0.001) and fold change >2.
- Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used for validation.
Main Results:
- Six candidate genes were identified as differentially expressed between ARLC-SCC and NARLC-SCC.
- MS4A1 and CARD18 were technically replicated by qRT-PCR.
- MS4A1 protein expression, detected by IHC (CD20), was localized to stromal lymphocytes, not tumor cells, in ARLC-SCC.
Conclusions:
- Differential MS4A1 expression in ARLC-SCC versus NARLC-SCC appears to be a stromal signal of uncertain significance.
- The study highlights the importance of tumor cell enrichment for gene expression studies targeting tumor phenotypes.
- No strong gene candidates were identified as markers of asbestos etiology in this study; further research is needed.


