Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

[Clinical implications from the results of the CASE-J extension]

Shinji Yasuno1, Akira Fujimoto, Kenji Ueshima

  • 1EBM Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.

Nihon Rinsho. Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine
|April 21, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Candesartan and amlodipine showed similar cardiovascular event rates in high-risk Japanese patients. However, candesartan demonstrated sustained superiority in preventing new-onset diabetes over amlodipine.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Hypertension management in high-risk populations requires careful drug selection.
  • Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are common antihypertensive classes.
  • Long-term comparative data for ARBs and CCBs in Japanese patients are valuable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the long-term cardiovascular outcomes of candesartan (ARB) versus amlodipine (CCB) in Japanese high-risk hypertensive patients.
  • To evaluate the incidence of cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death.
  • To assess the effect on new-onset diabetes.

Main Methods:

  • The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial and its observational extension (CASE-J Ex).
  • Follow-up of high-risk hypertensive patients treated with candesartan or amlodipine.
  • Analysis of primary cardiovascular events, mortality, and diabetes incidence.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in primary cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, or cardiovascular death between candesartan and amlodipine groups.
  • Candesartan showed sustained superiority in reducing new-onset diabetes compared to amlodipine.
  • Results corroborated findings from the initial CASE-J trial.

Conclusions:

  • Candesartan and amlodipine offer comparable efficacy for major cardiovascular events in high-risk Japanese hypertensives.
  • Candesartan provides a significant benefit in preventing new-onset diabetes, a finding sustained over long-term follow-up.
  • The CASE-J Extension confirms the long-term safety and specific benefits of candesartan in this patient cohort.

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:21

Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Thoracic, aortic arch and abdominal aneurysms are significant vascular conditions that can present with various clinical manifestations and lead to serious complications. Understanding these manifestations and the appropriate diagnostic studies is essential for effective management and treatment.Thoracic Aortic AneurysmsThoracic aortic aneurysms often remain asymptomatic until they reach a size that impinges on adjacent structures. They typically cause deep, diffuse chest pain that radiates to...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...