Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Major Somatic Sensory Pathways01:28

Major Somatic Sensory Pathways

Sensory impulses related to touch, pressure, vibration, and proprioception from various body parts, such as the limbs, trunk, neck, and posterior head, travel to the cerebral cortex through the posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway. The pathway’s name derives from the two white-matter tracts that convey the impulses: the spinal cord's posterior column and the brainstem's medial lemniscus. First-order sensory neurons extend their axons into the spinal cord, forming the posterior columns...
Extrasensory Perception01:23

Extrasensory Perception

Extrasensory perception, or ESP, suggests the ability to perceive events beyond the conventional senses of sight, hearing, and touch. Parapsychologists, who research ESP and related psychic phenomena, categorize ESP into three main types: precognition, telepathy, and clairvoyance.
Precognition involves foreseeing future events, such as predicting an accident before it happens. An example of precognition could be someone dreaming about a specific event, like a car crash, which then occurs...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sensation driven functional MRI study on brain activation during bladder filling in healthy participants.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Detrusor Underactivity and Acontractile Bladder Patients Performing Clean Intermittent Catheterization in a Single Tertiary Referral Center: What is Happening in Real Life?

International urogynecology journal·2025
Same author

Correction: Prolonged opioid use after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population: a multicentric observational study.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2025
Same author

Can EEG-Neurofeedback Training Enhance Effective Connectivity in People With Chronic Secondary Musculoskeletal Pain? A Secondary Analysis of a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

Mourning for Silence: Bereavement and Tinnitus-A Perspective.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Infraslow Closed-Loop Brain Training for Anxiety and Depression (ISAD): A pilot randomised, sham-controlled trial in adult females with internalizing disorders.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

The Bayesian brain: phantom percepts resolve sensory uncertainty.

Dirk De Ridder1, Sven Vanneste2, Walter Freeman3

  • 1Brai(2)n, TRI & Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium.

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
|April 21, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Phantom perceptions, or phantom sensations, occur when the brain generates false sensory information without external stimuli. This occurs due to the brain

Keywords:
BayesCingulateFree energyInformationInsulaNeuropathicPainTinnitusUncertainty

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Sensory deafferentation, the loss of sensory input, commonly leads to phantom perceptions across various sensory domains.
  • The underlying mechanisms driving these 'phantom' sensations in the absence of external stimuli remain a key question in neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the generation of phantom perceptions using a Bayesian brain model and the free-energy principle.
  • To elucidate how the brain reduces environmental uncertainty and prediction errors in sensory deafferentation.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual modeling based on Bayesian inference and the free-energy principle.
  • Analysis of neuroanatomical correlates, including sensory cortex activity, anterior cingulate, and insula involvement.

Main Results:

  • Phantom perceptions are interpreted as a mechanism to reduce topographically restricted uncertainty caused by deafferentation.
  • Sensory cortex hyperactivity, decreased inhibition, and map plasticity contribute to the generation of false sensory information.
  • Activation of areas involved in salience and stress (anterior cingulate, insula) supports stimulus detection and uncertainty reduction.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian brain model, driven by the free-energy principle, explains phantom percepts as a strategy to minimize uncertainty.
  • Phantom perceptions serve an adaptive function by attempting to make sense of the environment despite sensory loss.
  • This framework highlights the brain's predictive processing and active inference mechanisms in maintaining environmental awareness.