Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction
Tom Brett1, Diane Arnold-Reed, Cam Phan
1General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Freemantle, Western Australia. tom.brett@nd.edu.au
Insights
More frequent general practitioner (GP) visits improved cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. This targeted approach using absolute risk calculators in primary care can effectively modify global CVD risk, unlike usual care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- General Practice
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global cause of mortality.
- Current clinical practice often uses relative risk, not absolute risk, for CVD management.
- Absolute risk assessment provides a more accurate measure for patient risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if increased general practitioner (GP) visit frequency enhances absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment benefits.
- To compare the impact of intensive GP visits versus usual GP care on absolute CVD risk.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, open-label, pragmatic randomized study involving 1200 patients aged 40-80 years.
- Participants were allocated to either 3-monthly GP visits (intensive group) or usual GP care (opportunistic group) for 12 months.
- Absolute CVD risk scores (New Zealand Cardiovascular Risk Calculator), anthropometrics, blood pressure, and blood lipids were primary and secondary outcomes.
Main Results:
- The intensive GP visit group showed a significant reduction in absolute CVD risk (6.28% to 6.10%).
- No significant reduction in absolute CVD risk was observed in the usual care group (6.27% to 6.24%).
- Significant improvements were noted in the intensive group for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and waist circumference.
Conclusions:
- A targeted strategy employing absolute risk calculators is effective in primary care settings.
- This approach can successfully modify global cardiovascular disease risk assessment.
- Intensified GP engagement may offer superior cardiovascular risk management outcomes.
Background:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of global mortality. Risk factor management in clinical practice often relies on relative risk modification rather than the more appropriate absolute risk assessment.
Aim:
To determine whether patients receiving more-frequently designated GP visits had increased benefit in terms of their absolute CVD risk assessment, as compared with patients in receipt of their usual GP care.
Design And Setting:
Prospective, open, pragmatic block randomised study in a 1:1 group allocation ratio in three Western Australian general practices.
Method:
A convenience sample (n = 1200) of patients aged 40-80 years were randomised to 3-monthly GP visits (five in total for the intensive) or usual GP care (two in total for the opportunistic), with 12 months' follow-up. The main outcome was absolute CVD risk scores based on the New Zealand Cardiovascular Risk Calculator. Others outcome measures were weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure, and fasting blood lipids and glucose.
Results:
There were 600 patients per group at baseline. At 12 months' analysis there were 543 in the intensive group and 569 in the opportunistic group. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) absolute CVD risk reduced significantly between baseline and 12 months in the intensive group (6.28% [5.11] to 6.10% [4.94]) but not in the opportunistic group (6.27% [5.10] to 6.24% [5.38]). There was a significant reduction between baseline and 12 months in mean (SD) total cholesterol (5.28 mmol/l [0.94] to 5.08 mmol/l [0.96]); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.08 mmol/l [0.87] to 2.95 mmol/l [0.89]); triglyceride (1.45 mmol/l [0.86] to 1.36 mmol/l [0.84]); and in mean (SD) waist circumference in men (98.74 cm [10.70] to 97.13 cm [10.20]) and females (90.64 cm [14.62] to 88.96 cm [14.00]) in the intensive group.
Conclusion:
A targeted approach using absolute risk calculators can be used in primary care to modify global CVD risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies