Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

10:35
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
How does imaging frequency and soft tissue motion affect the PTV margin size in partial breast and boost
Emma J Harris1, Ellen M Donovan, Charlotte E Coles
1Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK. emma.harris@icr.ac.uk
Summary
Accurate breast radiotherapy margins are achievable with reduced imaging. Verification protocols optimize planning target volume (PTV) margins for partial breast and boost radiotherapy, minimizing dose and workload while maintaining accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Accurate targeting is crucial in partial breast and boost radiotherapy.
- Short fractionation schemas (15 fractions) require precise planning target volume (PTV) margins.
- Excision cavity (EC) deformation and motion introduce uncertainties in radiotherapy delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of verification protocols on PTV margins and treatment accuracy in short-course breast radiotherapy.
- To quantify the effect of EC deformation on PTV margin size.
- To determine the imaging dose necessary for achieving specific PTV margins.
Main Methods:
- Investigated 36 patients using implanted EC markers for verification imaging.
- Estimated target motion using on-line and off-line motion correction strategies (NAL, eNAL protocols).
- Calculated PTV margins based on motion and deformation data, and estimated imaging doses.
Main Results:
- PTV margins varied from 2.4mm to 10.2mm based on correction strategy.
- Average clip displacement was 0.8mm, with daily variation of 0.4mm.
- Deformation contributed less than 0.2mm to the PTV margin.
Conclusions:
- A PTV margin of ~10mm is feasible with minimal imaging dose.
- The extended No Action Level (eNAL) protocol may reduce PTV margins by ~4mm with doses of 0.4-25cGy.
- Deformation errors have a minor impact on PTV margins compared to setup or delineation errors.

