Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Concepts of Health and Illness01:29

Concepts of Health and Illness

Health is a condition of the body, mind, and spirit where an individual remains free from illness. Similarly, wellness is an active state, including living a lifestyle that promotes physical, mental, and emotional health. Physical health is critical for the overall well-being and can be affected by lifestyle, activity level, diet, and behavior. The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental and universal human right. Consider Lisa, a fifteen-year-old born with congenital...
Stress Response System01:21

Stress Response System

The stress response system, also known as the fight-or-flight response, is the body's automatic physiological reaction to perceived threats. Hans Selye introduced the concept of General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) to describe the predictable pattern of changes that occur in response to stress. GAS consists of three sequential stages: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion. This model helps explain how chronic stress can contribute to health problems.
Alarm stage
In the alarm stage, the body's initial...
Structural Organization of the Human Body: An Overview01:18

Structural Organization of the Human Body: An Overview

It is convenient to consider the body's structures in terms of fundamental levels of organization that increase in complexity: subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, organelles, cells, tissues, organs, organ systems, and organisms.
To study the chemical level of organization, scientists consider the simplest building blocks of matter: subatomic particles, atoms, and molecules. All matter in the universe is composed of one or more unique pure substances called elements, familiar examples of...
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops01:18

Positive and Negative Feedback Loops

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires  maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:
Homeostatic Imbalance01:10

Homeostatic Imbalance

Homeostasis is the maintenance of a stable internal environment within the body, which is crucial for the proper functioning of cells, tissues, organs, and organ systems. The body has various control mechanisms that work together to regulate various physiological parameters such as temperature, blood pressure, pH balance, and fluid balance, to name a few. These control mechanisms are based on feedback loops that can be either positive or negative.
However, sometimes these feedback loops fail,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Behavioral and structural drivers of HIV in men who have sex with men in Belize: a mixed-methods study.

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Factors associated with laboratory confirmation of suspected hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in southern Argentina: a retrospective observational case-control study.

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

[Compliance with drivers of the HEARTS-based integrated model for noncommunicable disease control in PeruNível de implementação dos fatores impulsionadores do modelo integrado para doenças não transmissíveis da iniciativa HEARTS no Peru].

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

[Comparing taxes as a percentage of sugar-sweetened beverage prices in Latin America and the CaribbeanComparação dos impostos como uma porcentagem do preço das bebidas açucaradas na América Latina e no Caribe].

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

[Prevalence of HTLV-1 infection in family members of index cases in PeruPrevalência familiar da infecção pelo HTLV-1 a partir de um caso índice no Peru].

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The role of regulatory policies on unhealthy commodities to prevent and control noncommunicable diseases in the Americas.

Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health·2026

Related Experiment Videos

[Health: an adaptive complex system].

Luis Fernando Toro-Palacio1, Francisco Luis Ochoa-Jaramillo

  • 1Universidad CES, Facultad de Medicina, Grupo de Investigación: Observatorio de la Salud Pública.

Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica = Pan American Journal of Public Health
|April 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This article examines health as a dynamic, evolving system rather than a static state. By applying principles of complexity science, the authors propose a new framework for improving how medical care and services are organized and delivered to individuals and society.

Keywords:
complexity sciencesystems theorymedical care modelshuman evolution

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Systems biology and adaptive complex systems research
  • Public health policy and health services delivery models

Background:

No prior work has fully bridged the divide between abstract intellectual complexity and practical experimental science. Current models often fail to capture the dynamic nature of human biological and social health. This gap motivated a re-evaluation of how we define wellness in a modern context. Prior research has shown that rigid, linear frameworks are insufficient for describing living organisms. That uncertainty drove the need for a more holistic perspective on human existence. It was already known that technological progress relies on experimental rigor, yet theoretical complexity remains isolated. This disconnect limits our ability to address multifaceted challenges in global society. The authors argue that viewing life through a lens of adaptive complexity offers a necessary shift in scientific thought.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to propose that health be considered an adaptive complex system to improve our understanding of human well-being. The authors seek to bridge the significant divide between abstract intellectual complexity and practical experimental science. This problem persists because current models often fail to account for the dynamic, interconnected nature of life. The motivation stems from a need to align technological advancements with a more holistic view of society. By redefining health, the researchers hope to foster a new approach that expands our current knowledge base. The study addresses the limitations of existing frameworks that treat medical care as a static, linear process. This work intends to provide a rationale for adopting systemic thinking in the delivery of health services. Ultimately, the authors aim to offer a series of appraisals that help us better understand our development as individuals and as a species.

Main Methods:

The authors utilize a theoretical review approach to synthesize concepts from complexity science and medical practice. This design involves evaluating the disconnect between abstract intellectual frameworks and experimental scientific methodologies. The study employs a qualitative analysis of existing literature to construct a new model for health. By examining life as a dynamic entity, the researchers identify key properties of adaptive systems. The review process focuses on how these properties apply to both individual biology and global societal structures. This methodology avoids traditional reductionist techniques in favor of a holistic, systemic evaluation. The authors systematically compare current care delivery models against the requirements of adaptive complexity. This approach provides a foundation for proposing a revised rationale for future research and practice.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that life and human society function as adaptive complex systems rather than static entities. The authors report that this shift in perspective is essential for aligning technological progress with intellectual complexity. Their analysis reveals that health care delivery models currently lack the flexibility required for truly adaptive systems. The study identifies specific emerging properties that characterize health when viewed through this systemic lens. These properties suggest that services must be designed to evolve alongside the individuals they serve. The authors demonstrate that a gap exists between theoretical complexity and practical experimental application in modern science. They report that recognizing this systemic nature allows for a more comprehensive understanding of human development. The findings indicate that this framework provides a basis for asking new, pertinent research questions about our species.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that viewing health as an adaptive complex system provides a robust framework for future inquiry. This synthesis suggests that service delivery models must evolve to match the dynamic nature of human biology. Researchers are encouraged to adopt this perspective to better understand the properties of wellness. The article implies that current care structures could benefit from integrating these emerging properties. By recognizing these systems, we may gain deeper insights into our development as a species. The authors maintain that this shift is vital for aligning theoretical models with practical outcomes. Future studies should explore how these systems influence individual and societal well-being. This perspective offers a pathway toward more effective and responsive health management strategies.

The authors propose that health functions as an adaptive complex system, where emerging properties and dynamic interactions define wellness. This contrasts with traditional linear models that treat biological states as static, predictable, and isolated from environmental influences.

The researchers utilize complexity science as a conceptual tool to bridge the gap between abstract theory and experimental application. This framework differs from reductionist approaches by emphasizing interconnectedness rather than isolating individual variables for study.

A shift toward adaptive complexity is necessary to address the limitations of current technological and scientific models. While traditional methods prioritize isolated data points, this approach requires an integrated view of global society and human biology.

The authors treat health care delivery as a dynamic, adaptive system rather than a fixed service. This role allows for the integration of emerging properties, distinguishing it from rigid, top-down administrative structures that ignore systemic feedback loops.

The researchers measure the success of this perspective by its ability to explain human development and societal evolution. This phenomenon is evaluated through the lens of adaptive properties, unlike conventional metrics that focus solely on clinical outcomes.

The authors propose that adopting this model will improve our understanding of human identity and species-level evolution. They suggest this shift helps reconcile our intellectual complexity with the practical realities of modern medical care.