Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling

Hongmao Sun1, Menghang Xia, Christopher P Austin

  • 1Department of Health and Human Services, NIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-3370, USA. hongmao.sun@nih.gov

The AAPS Journal
|April 25, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Traditional toxicity testing faces limitations, prompting a shift to in vitro methods. Quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) enhances computational toxicology and predictive model accuracy for chemical risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Biology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Traditional toxicity testing methods using animal models are costly, slow, ethically problematic, and lack human relevance.
  • There is a critical need for alternative strategies in chemical risk assessment that are more efficient and reliable.
  • In vitro human cell-based assays offer a promising alternative for identifying toxicity pathways and predicting in vivo responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the benefits and impact of quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) in chemical risk assessment.
  • To highlight the role of qHTS in advancing computational toxicology and predictive modeling.
  • To compare quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models based on traditional and qHTS data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing in vitro human cell-based assays to identify toxicity pathways and molecular mechanisms.
  • Employing quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) technology to analyze toxicological endpoints.
  • Developing and comparing computational toxicology models, including QSAR, using both in vivo and qHTS data.

Main Results:

  • qHTS efficiently decomposes complex toxicological endpoints into specific organ pathways.
  • In vitro assays coupled with qHTS improve machine learning effectiveness for mechanism of action identification.
  • qHTS enhances data quality and quantity for predictive toxicology model construction, as demonstrated in the US Tox21 program.

Conclusions:

  • qHTS-based in silico toxicity models demonstrate high reliability and robustness.
  • The increasing availability of qHTS data enriches the pool for predictive toxicology.
  • These advanced models are poised to become valuable tools for chemical risk assessment and drug discovery.

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Toxicokinetics: Overview01:21

Toxicokinetics: Overview

Studies that assess how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted (ADME) at toxic doses are termed toxicokinetics. Understanding toxicokinetics helps predict adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and manage toxicity in humans.Toxicokinetics differs from pharmacokinetics mainly in the dose levels studied, with toxicokinetics focusing on higher toxic doses. The kinetics at these levels can be non-linear due to altered physiological processes. Toxicodynamics examines the relationship...
Toxic Reactions: Overview01:26

Toxic Reactions: Overview

When toxic substances penetrate the human body, they disseminate to various tissues, undergoing metabolic changes. This process yields reactive metabolites that may covalently bind with specific target molecules, resulting in toxicity.
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions01:24

Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions

Drug toxicities can be stratified into pharmacological, pathological, or genotoxic based on their mechanisms. The incidence and severity of these toxicities generally increase with the drug's concentration in the body and exposure time.Pharmacological toxicity is evident when the therapeutic effects of drugs overshoot into adverse reactions in a predictable, dose-dependent manner. Central nervous system (CNS) depression from barbiturates is a classic example, with effects escalating from...
Bioactivation and Tissue Toxicity01:25

Bioactivation and Tissue Toxicity

Bioactivation is a metabolic process that transforms less reactive substances into highly reactive metabolites, initiating tissue toxicity. This transformation can lead to various toxic effects, including carcinogenesis and teratogenesis. Reactive metabolites are classified into two main types: electrophiles and free radicals.Electrophiles are electron-deficient species and are produced primarily by the enzyme cytochrome P-450 during the metabolism of compounds containing carbon, nitrogen, or...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).