Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role, impact, and feasibility of a comprehensive pharmacist medication review for patients in the older adult cancer clinic (OACC) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.

Journal of geriatric oncology·2026
Same author

Barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive health services among adolescents and young adults in Sidama region, Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

Reproductive health·2026
Same author

Reducing Hyperoxemia in Mechanically Ventilated Emergency Department Patients: A Before-and-After Study.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Exploring the preference of devices that can measure movement among people who have been hospitalised: A discrete choice experiment.

Digital health·2026
Same author

Implementation of co-designed strategies enhances referral to pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in tertiary care: an interrupted time series study.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same author

Dialling in for breastfeeding success, a mixed-methods approach to explore remote stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the use of telehealth for lactation support.

Rural and remote health·2026
Same journal

Lead in Drinking Water and Child Health: Evidence From Jackson, Mississippi.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Health on the Move: The Impact of Poverty Alleviation Relocation on Healthcare Utilization in China.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Compulsory Licensing: A Case Study of HIV Drugs.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Beyond Tobacco Prevention: The Effects of Tobacco 21 Laws on Young Adults' Body Weight.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Estimands and Estimates of Hospitalization Rates in Health Economics and Clinical Medicine.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Cuts on Mental Health: Evidence From Early Pandemic Program Expirations.

Health economics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Efficiency and equity: a stated preference approach.

Richard Norman1, Jane Hall, Deborah Street

  • 1Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Broadway, Sydney, Australia. richard.norman@chere.uts.edu.au

Health Economics
|April 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explored population preferences for health gain allocation, finding that people value health gains for non-smokers, carers, low-income individuals, and those with shorter life expectancies more highly. These findings challenge standard economic evaluation practices.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Decision science
  • Social welfare analysis

Background:

  • Economic evaluation in healthcare traditionally measures outcomes irrespective of patient characteristics.
  • Assessing equity in health interventions is complex and often relies on implicit or informal weighting.
  • Understanding population preferences for fairness in health resource allocation is crucial for policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elicit population preferences for allocating health gains among different patient groups.
  • To develop and apply a method for generating equity weights based on these preferences.
  • To assess the implications for economic evaluation in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • A discrete choice experiment was employed to gather data on population preferences.
  • A random-effects probit model was used for data analysis.
  • A technique for converting choice data into equity weights was adopted.

Main Results:

  • Population preferences indicate higher social value for health gains in non-smokers, carers, low-income individuals, and those with an expected age of death under 45.
  • Respondents showed a tendency to favor individuals with characteristics similar to their own.
  • The results suggest that equity weights may not be constant across all populations or contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional assumptions of constant equity weighting in healthcare economic evaluations may be challenged by empirical evidence of population preferences.
  • Formal equity weighting systems derived from population preferences could offer a more nuanced approach to efficiency-equity trade-offs.
  • Further research is needed to determine if formal equity weighting improves upon informal methods for decision-makers balancing equity and efficiency.