[Anesthesia using propofol during surgery of strabismus in children. A comparison of two different protocols of induction and maintenance]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
1Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, C.H.N.O. des Quinze-Vingt, Paris.
Insights
Protocol I, utilizing a higher propofol induction dose, demonstrated superior outcomes in pediatric strabismus surgery compared to Protocol II. This included improved induction quality, reduced injection pain, less bradycardia, and fewer post-operative nausea and vomiting incidents.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Propofol is a widely used anesthetic agent for induction and maintenance in pediatric surgery.
- Optimizing anesthetic protocols is crucial for improving patient safety and recovery, especially in children undergoing elective procedures like strabismus surgery.
- Understanding the comparative efficacy and safety of different propofol dosing regimens is essential for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare two distinct propofol-based anesthetic protocols for induction and maintenance in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery.
- To evaluate the quality of induction, maintenance, and recovery associated with each protocol.
- To assess specific adverse events such as injection pain, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 100 pediatric patients (4-8 years old, ASA I, NYHA I) scheduled for strabismus surgery.
- Two protocols were compared: Protocol I (Propofol 6 mg/kg + fentanyl 2 mcg/kg + vecuronium 0.08 mg/kg for induction, followed by propofol 11 mg/kg/h for maintenance) and Protocol II (Propofol 3 mg/kg + fentanyl 3 mcg/kg for induction, followed by propofol 12 mg/kg/h for maintenance).
- Key outcomes including induction quality, injection pain, intraoperative bradycardia, and postoperative nausea/vomiting were assessed.
Main Results:
- Protocol I demonstrated a significantly better quality of induction compared to Protocol II.
- Patients receiving Protocol I experienced a lower incidence of pain during propofol injection.
- Protocol I was associated with a better quality of maintenance, characterized by infrequent bradycardia related to oculocardiac reflex, and a significantly reduced frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Conclusions:
- Protocol I, involving a higher propofol induction dose, offers significant advantages over Protocol II for pediatric strabismus surgery.
- The findings suggest that Protocol I leads to improved anesthetic induction, better intraoperative stability, and enhanced recovery with fewer adverse events.
- This study supports the use of Protocol I as a potentially superior anesthetic strategy in this pediatric surgical population.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is an investigation of two protocols using propofol as induction and maintenance agent in 100 children scheduled for strabismus surgery (4-8 year, ASA I, NYHA I). Protocol I; Propofol 6 mg.kg-1 in 60 s with fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1 and vecuronium bromide 0.08 mg.kg-1 for induction, followed by propofol 11 mg.kg-1 for maintenance; Protocol II; Propofol 3 mg.kg-1 in 20 s with fentanyl 3 micrograms.kg-1 for induction, followed by propofol 12 mg.kg-1.h-1 for maintenance. It appears that the use of protocol I offers significant advantages compared with protocol II: a better quality of induction with a lesser incidence of pain during injection of propofol; a better quality of maintenance with very infrequent bradycardia from oculocardiac reflectivity; and a better recovery with a greatly reduced frequency of nausea and vomiting.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Stages of General Anesthesia
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview

