[Comments on retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy - laparoscopic versus robotic]

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in high risk clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) plays a limited role in modern uro-oncology due to the superior therapeutic efficacy of even one cycle of PEB (cysplatin, etoposide, bleomycin) chemotherapy. There might be an indication for the rare case of pure mature teratoma with unfavorable prognostic risk factors. If RPLND is performed for clinical stage I NSGCT it always has to be performed in a nerve-sparing technique and within the well-defined boundaries of an anatomically adequate template in order to avoid unnecessary adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. In this aspect, laparoscopic RPLND is inferior to open RPLND as basically all patients with lymph node positive disease receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The evidence for robotic-assisted RPLND is too weak to draw any clinically useful conclusions. Currently, it is an experimental procedure.Postchemotherapy RPLND (PC-RPLND) remains a surgery for tertiary referral centres due to the complexity of the surgical intervention and the high probability of adjunctive visceral and/or vascular surgery. In accordance with international guidelines it remains a domain for an open surgical approach. Laparoscopic PC-RPLND is reserved for small residual masses with the option of a unilateral modified template resection in very experienced laparoscopic centres. With regard to robotic-assisted PC-RPLND there is no evidence in the literature with regard to morbidity and complications, short-term and long-term oncological results being in favor of this experimental approach.