Biochemical, serological, and virulence characterization of clinical and oyster Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates

Jessica L Jones1, Catharina H M Lüdeke, John C Bowers

  • 1FDA, Division of Seafood Science and Technology, Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, Dauphin Island, Alaska, USA. Jessica.Jones@fda.hhs.gov

Insights

Serotype is the key difference between clinical and oyster Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Virulence genes tdh, trh, and type III secretion system (T3SS) genes may not reliably indicate pathogenicity, requiring further research.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Food Safety
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a significant cause of seafood-borne illness.
  • Understanding the genetic basis of V. parahaemolyticus pathogenicity is crucial for public health.
  • Virulence factors like tdh, trh, and type III secretion systems (T3SS) are often studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize clinical and oyster V. parahaemolyticus isolates from North America.
  • To compare biochemical profiles, serotypes, and virulence gene presence (tdh, trh, T3SS) between isolate groups.
  • To assess the reliability of specific genes as indicators of pathogenicity.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 77 clinical and 67 oyster V. parahaemolyticus isolates.
  • Biochemical profiling, serotyping, and detection of tdh, trh, and T3SS genes.
  • Correlation of genetic markers with isolate source (clinical vs. oyster).

Main Results:

  • 35 different serotypes were identified; 9 were shared between clinical and oyster isolates.
  • Pandemic-associated serotypes were found in clinical isolates; O1:KUT was present in 9% of oyster isolates.
  • Varied presence of tdh, trh, and T3SS genes was observed, with serotype being the most distinguishing feature between isolate types.

Conclusions:

  • Serotype is a more significant differentiator between clinical and oyster V. parahaemolyticus than previously thought.
  • The presence of tdh, trh, and T3SS genes may not be consistently reliable markers for V. parahaemolyticus pathogenicity.
  • Further in-depth investigations into the pathogenicity mechanisms of V. parahaemolyticus are warranted.