Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Distribution and Dispersion00:54

Distribution and Dispersion

To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Collective social niche construction shaping adaptive social networks.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Collective social niche construction shaping adaptive social networks.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Beyond individual selection: adaptive networks and collective social niche construction.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Mechanistic modelling reveals tuna physiological condition is not a driver of floating object association.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Quantifying the impact of habitat modifications on species behavior and mortality: A case study of tropical tuna.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2024
Same author

Direct assessment of tropical tuna abundance from their associative behaviour around floating objects.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Aggregation in woodlice: social interaction and density effects.

Pierre Broly1, Romain Mullier, Jean-Louis Deneubourg

  • 1Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France.

Zookeys
|April 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Social interactions, not just environmental factors, drive terrestrial isopod aggregation. Woodlice quickly form groups in shelters, with social cues influencing collective decisions and aggregate location.

Keywords:
Woodlouseaggregationdensitydynamicssocial interaction

More Related Videos

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Ecology
  • Social dynamics

Background:

  • Terrestrial isopods (woodlice) are known to be sensitive to environmental factors like humidity, brightness, and temperature.
  • Previous research assumed isopod aggregation was solely driven by individual responses to these environmental stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of social interaction in terrestrial isopod aggregation behavior.
  • To determine if environmental factors alone explain aggregation patterns or if social components play a significant role.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental arenas with two identical shelters were used to observe woodlouse aggregation.
  • Varying densities of woodlice (40-100 individuals) were introduced to assess aggregation patterns and dynamics.
  • Observation periods focused on the speed of aggregation and the distribution of individuals within and outside shelters.

Main Results:

  • Nearly 90% of woodlice aggregated rapidly (within 10 minutes) under shelters, irrespective of density.
  • Woodlice preferentially aggregated under a single shelter in 77% of experiments.
  • Aggregation size was capped, with approximately 70 individuals forming the maximum aggregate, and densities did not significantly impact aggregation patterns.

Conclusions:

  • While individual preferences influence aggregate location, social interaction is a key driver of aggregation dynamics and collective choice in terrestrial isopods.
  • The study highlights the importance of social components in understanding isopod aggregation beyond simple environmental responses.