Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Identifying patient subgroups who benefit most from a treatment: using administrative claims data to uncover

M Haim Erder¹, James E Signorovitch, Juliana Setyawan

¹Shire Development LLC, Wayne, PA, USA.

Journal of Medical Economics

|April 28, 2012

Abstract

Objectives:

To illustrate how claims data can be used to (1) develop outcome scores that predict response to a traditional treatment and (2) estimate the economic impact of individualized assignment to a newer treatment based on the outcome score. An example application is based on two treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX).

Methods:

Adolescents with ADHD initiating OROS-MPH (n=6320) or LDX (n=6394) were selected from the MarketScan claims database. A model was developed for predicting risk of switching/augmentation with OROS-MPH using multiple baseline characteristics. The model was applied to an independent sample to stratify patients by their predicted risk and, within each stratum, risk of switching/augmentation and ADHD-related total costs were compared between OROS-MPH and LDX patients using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results:

The prediction model resulted in substantial stratification, showing risk of switching/augmentation with OROS-MPH ranging from 11.3-42.1%. In the two strata where OROS-MPH had highest risk of switching/augmentation, LDX had significantly lower risk of switching/augmentation than OROS-MPH (by 7.0-8.2%) and lower ADHD-related annual total costs (by $264-$625 per patient).

Limitations:

The current study has used the risk of switching/augmentation as a proxy measure for treatment efficacy to establish the prediction model. Future research using a clinical measure for ADHD symptoms is warranted to verify the findings.

Conclusions:

Combining multiple patient characteristics into a predicted score for treatment outcomes with a traditional treatment can help identify subgroups of patients who benefit most from a new treatment. In this analysis, ADHD patients with a high predicted score for switching/augmentation with OROS-MPH had a lower rate of switching/augmentation with LDX. Assigning OROS-MPH and LDX treatments based on the predicted scores that are heterogeneous in a patient population may help improve clinical outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of care.

More Related Videos

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Advances in genomics have profoundly influenced drug discovery by increasing both the speed and accuracy of pharmaceutical development. Pharmacogenomics, which examines how genetic variation influences drug response, facilitates the identification of novel therapeutic targets and enables patient stratification for personalized treatment. These strategies contribute to improved drug efficacy, minimized adverse effects, and more efficient clinical trial design.Mapping genetic differences...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Treatment landscape, outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization in FLT3+ relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia in Mexico.

Cancer treatment and research communications·2026

Symptom Burden and Healthcare Resource Use in Patients With Claudin 18.2-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Review.

Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology·2026

Treatment Patterns and FLT3 Mutation Testing Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in China: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Therapeutics and clinical risk management·2024

3D pyramidal densely connected network with cross-frame uncertainty guidance for intravascular ultrasound sequence segmentation.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023

Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Hypothalamic Dysfunction: A Case Series and Systematic Review.

Neuroendocrinology·2023

Application of time-frequency domain and deep learning fusion feature in non-invasive diagnosis of congenital heart disease-related pulmonary arterial hypertension.

MethodsX·2023

See all related articles