Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

A Fibrin-Enriched and tPA-Sensitive Photothrombotic Stroke Model
Published on: June 4, 2021
Significance of good collateral compensation in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis
Alexander Y L Lau1, Edward H C Wong, Adrian Wong
1Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. alexlau@cuhk.edu.hk
Insights
Good collateral circulation is crucial for patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis, improving outcomes and reducing stroke recurrence. A composite circulation score effectively predicts prognosis in these individuals.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Collateral circulation is vital for stabilizing cerebral blood flow during acute occlusions.
- Its prognostic significance in intracranial atherosclerosis, particularly with moderate to severe stenosis, is less understood.
- This study investigates the link between antegrade flow, collateral circulation, and patient outcomes in symptomatic intracranial stenosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between antegrade flow across stenosis and collateral flow via leptomeningeal anastomosis.
- To determine the impact of these flow dynamics on neurological outcomes and recurrence risk in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 69 patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis (≥50% stenosis) was conducted.
- Angiograms were evaluated for antegrade flow (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [TICI] grading) and collateral flow (American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology [ASITN/SIR] grading).
- A composite circulation score was developed, and logistic regression models identified predictors of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and recurrence within 12 months.
Main Results:
- Compromised antegrade flow (TICI 0-2a) was seen in 36% of patients and correlated with more severe stenosis.
- A poor composite circulation score (indicating poor collateral compensation) was observed in 12% of patients.
- A good circulation score (preserved flow) was associated with favorable outcomes (OR 7.50) and reduced recurrence risk (OR 0.18).
Conclusions:
- Effective collateral compensation is more critical than antegrade or collateral grade alone in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis and compromised antegrade flow.
- Good collateral flow is linked to better neurological outcomes and a lower risk of recurrent TIA or stroke.
- Future studies should explore composite flow assessment for identifying high-risk intracranial stenosis with hemodynamic compromise.
Background:
Collateral circulation stabilizes cerebral blood flow in patients with acute occlusion, but its prognostic role is less studied in intracranial atherosclerosis and appears different in moderate to severe stenosis. We aimed to study the associations between antegrade flow across stenosis, collateral flow via leptomeningeal anastomosis, and the neurological outcome and recurrence risk in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis.
Methods:
We examined a cohort of consecutive patients admitted for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) with symptomatic intracranial stenosis confirmed by digital subtraction angiography in a single-center retrospective study. Angiograms were graded systematically in a blinded fashion for antegrade and collateral flow, using Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) and American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) grading, respectively, and integrated to a simple composite circulation score. Demographic and clinical variables, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months, recurrent stroke or TIA in 12 months were collected. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of good outcome (mRS 0-2) and recurrence in a logistic regression model.
Results:
Among 69 patients with pure intracranial atherosclerosis ≥ 50%, compromised antegrade flow (TICI 0-2a) was observed in 26 (36%) patients and was associated with more severe arterial stenosis (mean 86 vs. 74%, p = 0.001). Poor collateral compensation resulting in a poor composite circulation score was observed in 8 (12%) patients. Patients with a good circulation score (n = 61, 88%) had preserved flow, which was associated with more favorable outcome (OR 7.50, 95% CI 1.11-50.7, p = 0.04) and less recurrent TIA or stroke (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.96, p = 0.04). Prognosis was not significantly associated with antegrade or collateral grade per se.
Conclusion:
Good collateral compensations are more important in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis and compromised antegrade flow, and are associated with favorable outcome and less recurrence risk. The feasibility of composite flow assessment should be explored in future studies to identify high-risk intracranial stenosis with compromised hemodynamics.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management