Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Competition

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.

What are Populations and Communities?

What are Populations and Communities?

Ecological Niches

Ecological Niches

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.

Symbiosis

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Interspecific competition models and resource inequality between individuals.

Royal Society open science·2024

Same author

Inequality in resource allocation and population dynamics models.

Royal Society open science·2019

Same author

Interplay between habitat subdivision and minimum resource requirement in two-species competition.

Theoretical population biology·2018

Same author

Individual-based competition between species with spatial correlation and aggregation.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2014

Same author

Bottom-up derivation of population models for competition involving multiple resources.

Theoretical population biology·2011

Same author

The mechanistic basis of discrete-time population models: the role of resource partitioning and spatial aggregation.

Theoretical population biology·2010

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Monitoring Intraspecies Competition in a Bacterial Cell Population by Cocultivation of Fluorescently Labelled Strains

Monitoring Intraspecies Competition in a Bacterial Cell Population by Cocultivation of Fluorescently Labelled Strains

Published on: January 18, 2014

Interspecific competition models derived from competition among individuals.

Masahiro Anazawa¹

¹Department of Environmental Information Engineering, Tohoku Institute of Technology, Sendai 982-8577, Japan. anazawa@tohtech.ac.jp

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

|April 28, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study shows how individual competition and spatial distribution create population dynamics models for two species. Species coexistence depends heavily on how individuals distribute themselves across resources.

More Related Videos

Quantification of Interbacterial Competition using Single-Cell Fluorescence Imaging

Quantification of Interbacterial Competition using Single-Cell Fluorescence Imaging

Published on: September 2, 2021

Deferred Growth Inhibition Assay to Quantify the Effect of Bacteria-derived Antimicrobials on Competition

Deferred Growth Inhibition Assay to Quantify the Effect of Bacteria-derived Antimicrobials on Competition

Published on: September 3, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Monitoring Intraspecies Competition in a Bacterial Cell Population by Cocultivation of Fluorescently Labelled Strains

Monitoring Intraspecies Competition in a Bacterial Cell Population by Cocultivation of Fluorescently Labelled Strains

Published on: January 18, 2014

Quantification of Interbacterial Competition using Single-Cell Fluorescence Imaging

Quantification of Interbacterial Competition using Single-Cell Fluorescence Imaging

Published on: September 2, 2021

Deferred Growth Inhibition Assay to Quantify the Effect of Bacteria-derived Antimicrobials on Competition

Deferred Growth Inhibition Assay to Quantify the Effect of Bacteria-derived Antimicrobials on Competition

Published on: September 3, 2016

Area of Science:

Ecology
Mathematical Biology
Population Dynamics

Background:

Understanding interspecific competition is crucial for predicting species coexistence.
Existing models often lack a bottom-up derivation considering individual-level interactions and spatial heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

To derive discrete-time models of population dynamics for two competing species from fundamental principles.
To investigate how different competition types (scramble, contest) and spatial distributions influence interspecific competition dynamics.

Main Methods:

Developed a bottom-up approach to model population dynamics.
Incorporated individual competition types (scramble, contest) and three distinct spatial distribution functions.
Derived various interspecific competition models and a general model encompassing them as special cases.

Main Results:

Generated diverse interspecific competition models based on combinations of competition types and spatial distributions.
Identified a general model applicable across different spatial distribution patterns.
Demonstrated that the probability of species coexistence is significantly affected by spatial distribution.

Conclusions:

The spatial distribution of individuals is a critical factor shaping the dynamics of competing species.
Bottom-up modeling provides a more mechanistic understanding of population dynamics and interspecific competition.
Ecological models must account for spatial structure to accurately predict species interactions and coexistence outcomes.