Related Experiment Videos
Effect of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes
Muriel P C Grooteman1, Marinus A van den Dorpel, Michiel L Bots
1Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. P.J.Blankestijn@umcutrecht.nl
Insights
Online hemodiafiltration did not significantly reduce mortality or cardiovascular events compared to low-flux hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. High-volume hemodiafiltration may offer a survival benefit, but requires further confirmation.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The impact of online hemodiafiltration on mortality and cardiovascular events in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients remains uncertain.
- Chronic hemodialysis patients face significant risks of all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of online hemodiafiltration compared to low-flux hemodialysis in reducing all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events in ESRD patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized study involving 714 chronic hemodialysis patients.
- Patients were assigned to either online postdilution hemodiafiltration or continued low-flux hemodialysis.
- Primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of major cardiovascular events.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in all-cause mortality (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.75-1.20) or cardiovascular events (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.83-1.39) between groups.
- On-treatment analysis indicated a potential survival benefit with high-volume hemodiafiltration.
Conclusions:
- Online hemodiafiltration showed no significant benefit over low-flux hemodialysis for mortality or cardiovascular events in this ESRD cohort.
- Further research is needed to confirm the potential survival advantage observed with high-volume hemodiafiltration.
Abstract:
In patients with ESRD, the effects of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events are unclear. In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 714 chronic hemodialysis patients to online postdilution hemodiafiltration (n=358) or to continue low-flux hemodialysis (n=356). The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. The main secondary endpoint was a composite of major cardiovascular events, including death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, therapeutic coronary intervention, therapeutic carotid intervention, vascular intervention, or amputation. After a mean 3.0 years of follow-up (range, 0.4-6.6 years), we did not detect a significant difference between treatment groups with regard to all-cause mortality (121 versus 127 deaths per 1000 person-years in the online hemodiafiltration and low-flux hemodialysis groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.20). The incidences of cardiovascular events were 127 and 116 per 1000 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.39). Receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration during the trial associated with lower all-cause mortality, a finding that persisted after adjusting for potential confounders and dialysis facility. In conclusion, this trial did not detect a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events compared with low-flux hemodialysis. On-treatment analysis suggests the possibility of a survival benefit among patients who receive high-volume hemodiafiltration, although this subgroup finding requires confirmation.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy