Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
Published on: August 17, 2022
Interruptions and miscommunications in surgery: an observational study
Brigid M Gillespie1, Wendy Chaboyer, Nicole Fairweather
1NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions for Hospitalized Patients, Griffith Institute of Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract:
In surgery, as much as 30% of procedure-specific information may be lost as a result of miscommunication. We assessed the relationship between interruptions, team familiarity, and miscommunications across a purposive sample of 160 surgical procedures in 10 specialties during a six-month period. Descriptive analysis was used to quantify interruptions in respect to the source (ie, conversational, procedural) and type of miscommunication (ie, audience, purpose, occasion, content, experience). Results revealed an inverse correlation between the length of time that teams had worked together and the number of miscommunications in surgery (τ = -.33, P < .01). There was a positive correlation between the number of intraoperative interruptions and the number of miscommunications (τ = .30, P < .01). These results may help to inform the development of evidence-based interventions designed to mitigate the effects of miscommunications in surgery.
Insights
Surgical miscommunications decrease with team familiarity but increase with intraoperative interruptions. Understanding these factors can help reduce errors in the operating room.
Area of Science:
- Medical communication
- Surgical safety
- Human factors in medicine
Background:
- Miscommunication in surgery can lead to significant loss of procedure-specific information, impacting patient safety.
- Effective communication is crucial for successful surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between team familiarity, intraoperative interruptions, and surgical miscommunications.
- To identify factors contributing to information loss during surgical procedures.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 160 surgical procedures across 10 specialties over six months.
- Quantification of interruptions (conversational, procedural) and miscommunication types (audience, purpose, occasion, content, experience).
- Descriptive analysis and correlational statistics (Kendall's tau) to assess relationships.
Main Results:
- An inverse correlation was found between team familiarity and surgical miscommunications (τ = -.33, P < .01).
- A positive correlation was observed between intraoperative interruptions and miscommunications (τ = .30, P < .01).
Conclusions:
- Increased team familiarity is associated with fewer surgical miscommunications.
- Higher numbers of intraoperative interruptions correlate with increased miscommunications.
- Findings support the development of evidence-based interventions to mitigate surgical miscommunication.