Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026
Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Judet osteoperiosteal decortication for treatment of non-union: the Cornwall experience
Paul Guyver1, Christopher Wakeling, Kumar Naik
1Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Rd, Exeter, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom. paul_guyver@hotmail.com
Background:
The treatment of non union can be challenging with a variety of surgical options available to achieve bone consolidation. Robert Judet first described a method of osteo-periosteal decortication in 1963. He stated that by elevating cortical chips that remain attached to the periosteum and overlying soft tissues surrounding the site of non-union, combined with mechanical support, the bone consolidated. Despite excellent results presented in 2008 of 99% union rates with a mean delay of 8 months, the technique has not yet become popularised. We aim to show that Judet's method of decortication can achieve good results in the management of failure of union in a hospital other than Judet's.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis was performed from December 2002 to December 2008 of 40 cases in 39 patients of osteoperiosteal decortication for fracture non-union. Concurrent stabilisation was with internal fixation only. All procedures were performed by one surgeon (MN) using the Judet technique after learning the technique in the originators hospital. A preoperative non union scoring system was also used to assess its use in predicting persistent non-union.
Results:
Union was successfully achieved in 36 of the 39 surviving cases (92.3%) after a median delay of 8 months (range 3-47, SD 9.2) Twenty-six patients (65%) achieved union following the decortication procedure without subsequent operations. Factors such as open fracture and smoking did not have a statistically significant effect on union. The mean number of procedures following decortication was 0.68 (range 0-4). Metalwork failure occurred in 11 cases (28%), the majority in femoral decortications (n=9, 82%). The femur was the site of all persistent non unions in the series. Three patients had superficial infections and two had deep infections. The pre-operative non union scoring system (0-100) means were noticeably worse for the persistent non union group 42.0 (20-46) compared with the union group 31.0 (range 4-52).
Conclusions:
Osteoperiosteal decortication remains a highly effective surgical technique in the management of failed fracture union. The non union scoring system is a reliable predictor of persistent non union after this type of surgery.
Clinical Relevance:
Relevant to general trauma orthopaedic surgeon and specialist orthopaedic surgeons with an interest in fracture non-union.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
01:29Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...