Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Implementation of a Remote Respiratory Therapy in a Donor Center ICU Using a Telecritical Care Platform.

Critical care medicine·2026

Same author

A Guide to Implementing Fourth-Trimester Care in a Family Medicine Practice.

Family practice management·2026

Same author

ClimActor 2.0: A spatialized database of subnational climate pledges and emissions data.

Scientific data·2026

Same author

Implementation of Embedded Specialty Palliative Care in an Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Clinic.

The American journal of cardiology·2026

Same author

Monoclonal Antibody Treatment for Pediatric Asthma: Current Evidence and Findings From a Delaware Cohort Study.

Cureus·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

On the Assessment of Monte Carlo Error in Simulation-Based Statistical Analyses.

Elizabeth Koehler¹, Elizabeth Brown, Sebastien J-P A Haneuse

¹Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232.

The American Statistician

|May 1, 2012

Summary

Statistical experiments, known as Monte Carlo or simulation studies, often lack reporting on their inherent uncertainty, or Monte Carlo error. This study introduces practical methods for quantifying this error and determining necessary simulation replications for reliable results.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Statistics
Computational Statistics
Biostatistics

Background:

Monte Carlo (simulation) studies are crucial for evaluating statistical methods under controlled conditions.
Advances in computing have improved simulation efficiency (variance reduction), but experiments remain subject to uncertainty due to their finite nature.
Reporting and justifying Monte Carlo error, the uncertainty in simulation results, is often neglected in published literature.

Purpose of the Study:

To present practical methods for estimating Monte Carlo error.
To provide guidance on determining the required number of replications for desired accuracy in simulations.
To highlight the importance of addressing Monte Carlo error in statistical research.

Main Methods:

Development and demonstration of simple, practical methods for estimating Monte Carlo error.
Application of methods to determine the necessary number of replications for achieving specific accuracy levels.
Illustrative examples using logistic regression parameter estimation and bootstrap confidence intervals.

Main Results:

Monte Carlo error can be substantial and is often underestimated in statistical simulations.
The proposed methods offer practical approaches to quantify and manage simulation uncertainty.
The number of replications significantly impacts the reliability of simulation study outcomes.

Conclusions:

There is a critical need for increased emphasis on reporting and addressing Monte Carlo error in simulation studies.
Implementing the presented methods can enhance the rigor and reproducibility of statistical research.
Underestimating Monte Carlo error can lead to overconfidence in statistical findings.