Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physicians should be expert witnesses.

R Fish1, P Rosen

  • 1Covenant Medical Center, Champaign, Illinois.

The Journal of Emergency Medicine
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Physicians should serve as impartial expert witnesses in medical malpractice litigation to ensure fair case evaluation. Their reluctance stems from mistrust and misconceptions, risking less objective evaluations if they abstain.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Timeline to dysphagia resolution after endoscopic intervention of an interarytenoid defect based on Video Fluoroscopic Swallow Study dysphagia severity.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2023
Same author

Open versus Closed technique for administration of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Morbidity and Mortality outcomes from a high-volume centre.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2023
Same author

Optimal timing and technique for endoscopic management of dysphagia in pediatric aerodigestive patients.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2021
Same author

Referral and treatment pathways for pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin within a national treatment programme.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2018
Same author

Systematic review of outcome measures following chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer (CORMAC).

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2018
Same author

Core outcome research measures in anal cancer.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2017

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Medical Ethics
  • Professional Responsibility

Background:

  • Physicians have societal, peer, and patient obligations in medical malpractice litigation.
  • Physician reluctance to serve as expert witnesses is common.
  • Misconceptions about the legal system and mistrust of attorneys contribute to this reluctance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the physician's role in ensuring proper evaluation of medical malpractice cases.
  • To highlight the importance of physician participation as expert witnesses.
  • To advocate for impartial physician involvement in legal evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the physician's responsibility in malpractice litigation.
  • Exploration of reasons for physician reluctance to act as expert witnesses.
  • Definition of the ideal qualifications and role of an expert witness.

Main Results:

  • Physicians are reluctant to participate due to fear of furthering suits, mistrust of attorneys, and misconceptions.
  • Impartial practicing physicians are crucial for selecting appropriate cases and identifying negligence.
  • Failure of impartial physicians to evaluate cases may lead to reliance on less objective experts.

Conclusions:

  • Physician participation as impartial expert witnesses is vital for the integrity of medical malpractice litigation.
  • Addressing physician reluctance and misconceptions is necessary for objective case evaluation.
  • The role of the expert witness is to provide an unbiased medical assessment within the legal framework.

Related Experiment Videos