Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

06:37
Electroencephalography Network Indices as Biomarkers of Upper Limb Impairment in Chronic Stroke
Published on: July 14, 2023
Volume conduction effects in brain network inference from electroencephalographic recordings using phase lag index.
Luis R Peraza1, Aziz U R Asghar, Gary Green
1Intelligent Systems Group, Department of Electronics, University of York, YO10 5DD, UK. luis.peraza@gmail.com
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|May 2, 2012
Summary
This study evaluates the Phase Lag Index (PLI) for brain network inference in EEG. Results show PLI is partially invariant to volume conduction, but high clustering in PLI-derived networks may stem from this artifact, potentially biasing results.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Electroencephalography (EEG) is crucial for brain network inference.
- Volume conduction in EEG can distort connectivity estimates.
- Phase Lag Index (PLI) is a common synchrony measure used in neuroscience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of the Phase Lag Index (PLI) in brain network inference using EEG data.
- To investigate the impact of volume conduction on PLI-based network estimation.
- To compare PLI with other synchrony measures like coherence (R) and phase coherence (PC) under simulated volume conduction.
Main Methods:
- Simulated EEG data using a four-sphere head model to mimic volume conduction.
- Estimated brain networks using PLI, R, and PC under conditions with and without volume conduction.
- Analyzed network properties, including clustering coefficient and small-worldness, under the null hypothesis of independent sources.
Main Results:
- Coherence (R) and Phase Coherence (PC) were highly influenced by volume conduction, inferring clustered networks.
- Phase Lag Index (PLI) demonstrated partial invariance to volume conduction.
- PLI-derived networks exhibited small-world properties, but high clustering was attributed to volume conduction artifacts when compared to PLI-NVC (no volume conduction).
Conclusions:
- Volume conduction can influence Phase Lag Index (PLI) results in EEG brain network inference.
- Ignoring the effects of volume conduction may lead to biased network estimations.
- Further research is needed to refine PLI or develop alternative methods to mitigate volume conduction artifacts in EEG connectivity analysis.

