Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Tail Vein Transection Bleeding Model in Fully Anesthetized Hemophilia A Mice
Published on: September 30, 2021
Beyond patient benefit: clinical development in hemophilia
Günter Auerswald1, Silva Zupančić Šalek, Gary Benson
1Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Professor Hess Children's Hospital, Bremen, Germany. guenterauerswald@aol.com
Abstract:
Historically in hemophilia, outcome measures have not been collected systematically. Hence, there are insufficient clearly defined, evidence-based measures that can be applied consistently across hemophilia trials. This review focuses on some key challenges to evaluating patient outcomes and performing trials identified by experts at the Fourth and Fifth Zurich Haemophilia Forums. As procedures appear inconsistent across Europe, guidelines require modification to be more appropriate and/or realistically achievable. The outcome measures utilized, and the timing of their collection, should also be standardized, and more objective measures used where feasible. Implementation of outcome measures could be refined through greater understanding of patient heterogeneity, and tailored to differentiate between hemophilia- and aging-related disease effects. Furthermore, robust outcome measures that can also inform health-economic decisions are increasingly needed. Lastly, as patient recruitment poses a challenge, the panel proposed a call for action to motivate physicians and patients to participate in clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.

