Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergency Department Utilization of Physical Restraints: A Study of Documentation Compliance and Adverse Events.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2024
Same author

Determining Outcomes in Nonpenetrating Trauma With qSOFA.

The Journal of surgical research·2024
Same author

Use of Andexanet Alfa for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in US Verified Trauma Centers: A National Survey.

Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis·2024
Same author

Predicting long‑term survival following involved site radiotherapy for oligometastases.

Oncology letters·2024
Same author

The Impact of Screening for Perioperative ICU Admission in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.

Cureus·2023
Same author

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Analysis of 35 Consecutive Patients.

Cureus·2023
Same journal

ENRS President's Message.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

ENRS President's Message.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Theory in Science.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Using National Databases to Analyze Nurse Suicide Mortality.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Study Protocol to Characterize Symptom Experience During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cutaneous Melanoma.

Nursing research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Propensity score estimates in multilevel models for causal inference.

Patricia Eckardt1

  • 1School of Nursing, Stony Brook University, New York 11794-8240, USA. patricia.eckardt@stonybrook.edu

Nursing Research
|May 4, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

School environments impact student health habits. Healthy eating in supportive schools did not significantly change BMI, while in non-supportive schools, it nonsignificantly increased BMI, showing a small overall difference.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Adolescent Health
  • Obesity Prevention

Background:

  • Teenage obesity is a significant national health issue.
  • School and community initiatives are crucial for promoting healthy student behaviors.
  • Effective interventions require addressing both nutrition and exercise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate a methodology for estimating causal effects of healthy behaviors.
  • To analyze the impact of socially supportive school environments on student health.
  • To utilize a potential outcomes approach within a multilevel setting.

Main Methods:

  • Employed propensity score estimates within a multilevel model for causal inference.
  • Utilized a potential outcomes approach for causal modeling.
  • Conducted secondary analysis on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health data (13,854 students, 164 administrators).

Main Results:

  • Healthy eating in supportive school environments showed a nonsignificant decrease in Body Mass Index (BMI).
  • Healthy eating in non-supportive school environments showed a nonsignificant increase in BMI.
  • A difference of 0.3484 in BMI was observed between students in supportive and non-supportive schools.

Conclusions:

  • School settings significantly influence the causal effects of student eating habits.
  • Further research is needed to understand the causal impacts of student habits and school programs.
  • Findings highlight the importance of school environment in health behavior interventions.