Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

10:35
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Surface and superficial dose dosimetric verification for postmastectomy radiotherapy
An-Cheng Shiau1, Min-Chi Chiu, Tung-Ho Chen
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Summary
This study measured surface and superficial doses in postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) offered more uniform PTV doses and better skin sparing compared to tangential wedged fields (TWFs).
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Dosimetry
Background:
- Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) involves treating the chest wall, a region with high dosimetric uncertainty due to thin tissue and underlying lung.
- Accurate dose delivery to the chest wall while minimizing dose to superficial tissues is crucial for effective treatment and reducing side effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure and evaluate surface and superficial doses for patients undergoing PMRT using different treatment techniques.
- To compare the dosimetric characteristics of tangential wedged fields (TWFs) and 4-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for PMRT.
Main Methods:
- A phantom simulating the chest wall and lung was used with varying thicknesses.
- Computed tomography (CT) imaging, clinical target volumes (CTVs), and planning target volumes (PTVs) were defined.
- TWF and 4-field IMRT plans were created with a prescribed dose of 180 cGy per fraction.
- Radiochromic external beam therapy (EBT) films were used to measure dose profiles at various depths (0-5 mm).
Main Results:
- TWF plans showed underdoses in median and lateral regions, with surface doses around 52% of the prescribed dose and maximum doses up to 118%.
- 4-field IMRT plans demonstrated more uniform dose distributions within the PTV (>94% at >1 mm depth) and a mean surface dose of approximately 65%.
- Maximum doses in IMRT plans were below 118.4% of the prescribed dose.
Conclusions:
- The choice of treatment technique significantly impacts surface and superficial dose distribution in PMRT.
- IMRT plans provide more uniform PTV coverage and potentially better skin sparing compared to TWF.
- Consideration of bolus, treatment technique, and target coverage is essential for optimizing PMRT and managing skin reactions.
