Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Translational Orthotopic Models of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Published on: February 17, 2023
The histopathological spectrum of human meningiomas
Thomas Backer-Grøndahl1, Bjørnar H Moen, Sverre H Torp
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Trondheim University Hospital, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract:
Histopathological examination and grading of meningiomas gives valuable prognostic information, although the method is subject for interobserver variability. The aim of this study was to review a large series of human meningiomas in order to examine the frequency of benign (grade I), atypical (grade II), and anaplastic (grade III) forms depending on various WHO classification schemes. In addition, we wanted to describe the frequency of various histopathological features and their mutual correlations. Sections from 196 consecutively treated primary human meningioma patients were revised retrospectively. The established criteria to grade meningiomas, which are also known to be associated with tumorigenesis, were shown to correlate significantly. The number of grade II meningiomas increased when using the WHO 2007 classification (30%) compared with previous editions, mainly due to the definition of brain infiltrating meningiomas as atypical (grade II). bimodal frequency distribution among age groups of females was observed. Continuous revision of histopathological classification systems is required to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
Insights
Histopathological grading of meningiomas provides prognostic insights but faces interobserver variability. The WHO 2007 classification increased atypical (grade II) meningioma diagnoses, highlighting the need for revised diagnostic criteria.
Area of Science:
- Neuropathology
- Oncology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Histopathological grading of meningiomas is crucial for prognosis.
- Interobserver variability affects meningioma grading accuracy.
- Previous World Health Organization (WHO) classifications have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the frequency of meningioma grades (I, II, III) using different WHO classifications.
- To analyze histopathological features and their correlations.
- To assess the impact of the WHO 2007 classification on meningioma grading.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of histopathological sections from 196 primary human meningioma patients.
- Analysis of established grading criteria and their correlation with tumorigenesis.
- Comparison of meningioma grade frequencies across different WHO classification schemes.
Main Results:
- The WHO 2007 classification led to a significant increase in atypical (grade II) meningiomas (30%), primarily due to classifying brain-infiltrating tumors as grade II.
- Established grading criteria showed significant correlation with tumorigenesis.
- A bimodal frequency distribution was observed in age groups of females.
Conclusions:
- The WHO 2007 classification impacts meningioma grading, particularly for infiltrating types.
- Continuous revision of histopathological classification systems is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy.
- Further research into meningioma histopathology and classification is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Viral Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Cranial and Spinal Meninges
Cranial Meninges
These meningeal layers cover the cranium. The dura mater is the outermost layer of cranial meninges. It is a thick and durable membrane of dense...
