Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
General practitioner's reported use of clinical guidelines for hypertension and ambulatory blood pressure
1Western Regional General Practice Training Programme, Co Galway. evaflynn@hotmail.com
Insights
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is clinically valuable for hypertension management in primary care. However, barriers like cost and time limit its widespread adoption by general practitioners.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Primary Care Medicine
- Clinical Hypertension Management
Background:
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recognized as a valuable tool for improving blood pressure control in primary care settings.
- Clinical guidelines for hypertension frequently recommend the use of ABPM for diagnosis and management.
- Despite recommendations, the actual utilization of ABPM in primary care may be influenced by various factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the adherence to clinical guidelines for hypertension management among general practitioners (GPs).
- To explore the perceived role and current utilization of ABPM in primary care.
- To identify barriers hindering the effective implementation of ABPM in routine clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire survey was distributed to general practitioners (GPs) in the West of Ireland.
- The survey assessed the use of clinical guidelines, perceived sufficiency of clinic blood pressure monitoring, and factors influencing ABPM use.
- Data analysis focused on the reported usage rates and identified limitations.
Main Results:
- A high percentage of GPs (88%) utilize clinical guidelines that recommend ABPM.
- A significant majority of GPs (82%) consider clinic blood pressure monitoring insufficient for hypertension diagnosis and monitoring.
- Key barriers to ABPM use include lack of remuneration (72%), cost (68%), and time constraints (51%), despite good access.
Conclusions:
- General practitioners acknowledge the clinical importance of ABPM for hypertension management.
- Significant barriers, including financial and logistical challenges, impede the broader application of ABPM in primary care.
- Addressing these barriers is crucial to optimizing hypertension care through enhanced blood pressure monitoring.
Abstract:
ABPM is an invaluable clinical tool, as it has been shown to improve blood pressure control in primary care. Many clinical guidelines for hypertension advocate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. This study aims to quantify the use of clinical guidelines for hypertension and to explore the role of ABPM in Primary Care. A questionnaire survey was sent to GPs working in the West of Ireland. 88% (n=139) of GPs use clinical guidelines that recommend the use of ABPM. 82% (n=130) of GPs find use of clinic blood pressure monitoring insufficient for the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension. Despite good access to ABPM, GPs report lack of remuneration, 72% (n=116), cost 68% (n=108), and lack of time, 51% (n=83) as the main limiting factors to use of ABPM. GPs recognise the clinical value of ABPM, but this study identifies definite barriers to the use of ABPM in Primary Care.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...