Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences01:28

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences

Social behavior is a complex phenomenon that arises from the interaction between biological predispositions and environmental influences. This intricate interplay shapes how individuals think, feel, and act in various social contexts. Understanding these mechanisms requires insights from psychology, neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary theory.Environmental Influences on Social BehaviorEnvironmental factors, including temperature, odors, and visual stimuli, play a crucial role in shaping...
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Cognition and Behavior01:23

Cognition and Behavior

Social psychology examines the complex interplay between individual mental processes and social interactions. Historically, the field was divided into two domains: social behavior and social cognition. Researchers focusing on social behavior analyzed actions within social contexts, such as conformity, aggression, or cooperation. Meanwhile, social cognition researchers investigated how people perceive, interpret, and mentally represent their social environments. However, modern perspectives no...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The habitual, spatial and temporal conditions of everyday youth intergroup contact in an ethnically diverse city.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

A longitudinal multilevel analysis of individual- and contextual-level predictors of cross-ethnic friendships in the UK.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Navigating the boundary between 'normative' and 'non-normative' collective action: A British case study of the removal of a public statue associated with racism.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Correction: Exploring influences of past learning experiences, individualist-collectivist cultural identity and social value orientations on Chinese and UK undergraduates' learning preferences.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Exploring influences of past learning experiences, individualist-collectivist cultural identity and social value orientations on Chinese and UK undergraduates' learning preferences.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Understanding and harnessing intergroup contact in educational contexts.

The British journal of social psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Micro-ecological behavior and intergroup contact.

Shelley McKeown1, Ed Cairns, Maurice Stringer

  • 1University of Ulster, Department of Psychology, Northern Ireland, UK. shelleymckeown@gmail.com

The Journal of Social Psychology
|May 8, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Intergroup contact research often uses self-reports. This study used multi-methods to show micro-ecological behavior doesn't always reflect outgroup attitudes, offering new observational methods.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Intergroup Relations
  • Micro-ecology

Background:

  • Traditional intergroup contact research heavily relies on self-report measures.
  • Recent micro-ecological research offers new perspectives on observable behaviors.
  • Previous studies lacked holistic, multi-method approaches to assess intergroup contact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To employ a multi-method approach, integrating observable behavior and attitudinal measures.
  • To examine the relationship between micro-ecological behavior and intergroup attitudes in a community intervention program.
  • To introduce novel methods for observing micro-ecological behaviors in non-racial contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a multi-method approach combining observable micro-level behavior measurement with intergroup attitude assessments.
  • Employed infrahumanization scales and focus groups to gauge intergroup attitudes.
  • Conducted research within a community intervention program in Northern Ireland.

Main Results:

  • Micro-ecological behavior was not consistently indicative of outgroup attitudes.
  • Study 1 showed aligned changes in behavior (less aggregation) and attitudes (less infrahumanization).
  • No significant differences in infrahumanization were found between participants seated next to outgroup members and those who were not.

Conclusions:

  • Observable micro-ecological behaviors do not necessarily predict intergroup attitudes.
  • The study highlights a novel methodological contribution for observing micro-ecological behaviors in diverse settings.
  • Findings suggest a complex interplay between observed behavior and attitudes in intergroup contact scenarios.