Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Towards Real-World Deployment of Legged Robots.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2022
Same author

Automated detection of broadband clicks of freshwater fish using spectro-temporal features.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2015
Same author

Autonomous surveillance for biosecurity.

Trends in biotechnology·2015
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

Using feature vectors to detect frog calls in wireless sensor networks.

Benjamin Croker1, Navinda Kottege

  • 1School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. benjamin.croker@gmail.com

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|May 8, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a novel method for identifying giant barred frog (Mixophyes iteratus) calls in noisy environments. The system accurately distinguishes frog vocalizations from other species and background sounds.

More Related Videos

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization
06:00

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization

Published on: August 27, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization
06:00

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization

Published on: August 27, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Bioacoustics
  • Amphibian Ecology
  • Wildlife Monitoring

Background:

  • Accurate identification of amphibian vocalizations is crucial for biodiversity assessments.
  • Noisy environments pose significant challenges for automated species detection.
  • Giant barred frogs (Mixophyes iteratus) are a vulnerable species requiring effective monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a robust method for detecting giant barred frog (Mixophyes iteratus) vocalizations in real-world, noisy audio recordings.
  • To differentiate M. iteratus calls from those of other species and ambient noise using automated feature analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Audio recordings were collected using remote wireless sensor nodes.
  • Individual sounds were segmented, and feature vectors were extracted.
  • A Euclidean distance-based system compared extracted features against known M. iteratus call features.

Main Results:

  • The detection system achieved a sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.92 when distinguishing M. iteratus calls from other species.
  • The system demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.82 against background noise.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method offers a reliable approach for automated detection of giant barred frog vocalizations.
  • This technology can enhance conservation efforts by enabling efficient monitoring in challenging acoustic conditions.