Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Planning Nursing Care I

Planning Nursing Care I

The planning phase of the nursing process helps nurses set priorities, outline patient-centered goals and expected outcomes, and tailor nursing interventions to align with the aligned care plan. Through the planning phase, the nurse applies critical thinking skills to align and develop interventions according to the patient's needs. It provides continuity of care allowing patients to receive the maximum benefit from treatment. It serves as a pilot plan for allocating individual staff to a...

Planning Nursing Care II

Planning Nursing Care II

A nursing care plan can present in two forms: informal and formal. Informal is a care plan for the individual use of the nurse and goals they wish to accomplish during their shift. Informal care plans are not included in the patient chart. A formal nursing care plan is a written or computerized guide that organizes patient care. It is further subdivided into two: standardized and individualized care plans. Standardized care plans are pre-populated care plans for specific patient populations,...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ventral coxofemoral luxation in poodle breeds: multicentre retrospective case series.

The Journal of small animal practice·2026

Same author

MATERNAL HEALTH LITERACY AND QUALITY OF CARE OFFERED TO PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING ANTENATAL CARE SERVICES IN LAGOS, NIGERIA.

Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine·2025

Same author

ASSESSMENT OF CAREGIVERS' KNOWLEDGE, RETENTION AND UTILIZATION OF CHILD HEALTH CARDS IN OYO STATE, NIGERIA: A MIXED METHOD STUDY WITH A CONVERGENT DESIGN.

Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine·2025

Same author

Cumulative gonadal hormone exposure is nonlinearly associated with risk of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease: a generalised additive model analysis of 20,590 dogs (1988-2023).

The Journal of small animal practice·2025

Same author

Derivation of a simple risk calculator for predicting clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease.

JHLT open·2025

Same author

Food insecurity and periodontitis in US adults.

Community dental health·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Evolving treatment plan quality criteria from institution-specific experience.

D Ruan¹, W Shao, J Demarco

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. druan@mednet.ucla.edu

Medical Physics

|May 8, 2012

Summary

This study introduces a new method to improve radiation therapy plan quality by evolving institution-specific criteria based on past treatment data. This approach enhances consistency and helps identify optimal treatment plans.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Physics
Radiation Oncology
Health Informatics

Background:

Radiation therapy plan quality is typically assessed using dose volume histogram (DVH) endpoints.
National guidelines provide reference values for DVH endpoints, serving as acceptance criteria for treatment plan review.
Institutional variations in treatment planning necessitate reporting plan quality based on practice consistency and institutional experience.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a systematic approach for recording and characterizing institutional plan experience.
To utilize this experience to guide the design of adaptive plan quality criteria.
To improve overall plan quality and consistency and detect abnormal plans for retrospective analysis.

Main Methods:

A self-evolving methodology and in-house software suite were developed.
The system extracts dose endpoints from treatment plans.
It evaluates endpoints against national and institution-specific criteria, evolving statistics, and updating criteria over time.

Main Results:

The methodology's validity was demonstrated using prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) cases.
Evolving institution-specific criteria serve as a reliable measure of plan quality consistency.
This approach allows for tighter criteria than national standards, potentially optimizing treatment plans.

Conclusions:

A rationale for improving radiation therapy plan quality and consistency through evolving institution-specific criteria has been established.
The prototype system validated the proposed method using prostate SBRT data.
The infrastructure is applicable to general outcome data, promising enhanced clinical practice, efficiency, consistency, and treatment outcomes.