Immunocytochemistry of fine needle aspirates. A tactical approach

To maximize the potential of immunocytodiagnosis for fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples, it is necessary to be aware of the pitfalls and limitations of these techniques and to formulate a strategy to deal with the many variables involved. Five cases are presented to illustrate some of these variables, which include determining the adequacy of the FNA specimen, selecting tactics for cytologic and immunocytochemical studies, selecting methods for processing the FNA sample, preparing smears to enrich and preserve cells of interest, selecting enzyme labeling methods to optimize sensitivity and specificity, selecting monoclonal antibodies to make the study efficient and pertinent and interpreting the study results. The adequacy of the FNA specimen could be determined by an immediate cytologic assessment of the aspirate as it was obtained. Alcohol-fixed smears and formalin-fixed tissue sections prepared from the aspirate were used for diagnosis; the immunocytochemical studies were used as a diagnostic adjunct for accurate cell identification. Immunocytochemical studies were done on air-dried cytocentrifuge smears of pre-washed cells. While both immunoperoxidase and immunoalkaline phosphatase methods were suitable, we recommend the immunoperoxidase method for the study of aspirates from nonhemopoietic tissues and the immunoalkaline phosphatase method for the study of aspirates with many blood cells present. The proper selection of monoclonal antibodies and the interpretation of the results are best made in the context of the cytologic characteristics of the FNA sample and the clinical features of the patient.