[Retraction pockets, pathological entity?]

Retraction pockets are not a pathological entity per se but take after various ear diseases, with which they share the same morphological eardrum alterations. The authors believe that any holistic evaluation of retraction pockets, as though these were forming a single group of like pathogenic origin, i.e., tubal dysfunction, would be artificial and raise therapeutic problems. The statistical analysis of the causes for retraction pocket formation provides little information. Otologists are still looking into chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma as a possible, long-suspected, unproved etiology. Electron microscopy and, more particularly, istological-enzymological analyses of mounts prepared by the authors have shown, in some cases, the anomalous presence, in the pocket, of Langerhans' cells, which the authors consider as strongly indicative of cholesteatoma. While confirming the clinical diagnosis, anatomopathological examination allows to differentiate poor-prognosis retraction pockets from benign ones. The pathogenesis of these pockets is still poorly understood. It is the authors' contention that tympanic invagination is more likely traceable to some biopathological/biochemical phenomenon than to occupational mechanical disorders involving the tube. The clinical characteristics of retraction pockets are the basis for their classification into three groups, according to their evolutional tendency. Thus, developing cholesteatomas bear a poor prognosis; sequelae of benign otitis are associated with small risk; lastly, there is a small group of pockets the evolution of which is hard to specify. The authors believe that such differentiation between retraction pockets is mandatory to have a clear picture of therapeutic indications, and to assess the various outcomes.