Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making waves: Moving beyond the 1 in 10,000 benchmark in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) through evidence-informed risk approaches and systems decision-making.

Water research·2025
Same author

A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) approach to determine water quality guidelines for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in building plumbing.

Water research·2025
Same author

Research gaps and priorities for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA).

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2024
Same author

Non-potable water reuse and the public health risks from protozoa and helminths: a case study from a city with a semi-arid climate.

Journal of water and health·2023
Same author

Fate and Exposure Assessment of Pb Leachate from Hypothetical Breakage Events of Perovskite Photovoltaic Modules.

Environmental science & technology·2023
Same author

Quantitative Assessment of Microbial Pathogens and Indicators of Wastewater Treatment Performance for Safe and Sustainable Water Reuse in India.

Microbiology spectrum·2022
Same journal

Wildland Fires in the US between 2007 and 2018: Characterizing Equity in Exposures and Health Impacts.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Profiling Active Low-Abundance Microbes in As/Sb-Contaminated Soils via d-Amino Acid-Based In Situ Labeling.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Looking beyond Sorption in GAC Filters: How Extended Contact Times and Functionally Distinct Microbial Biomass Enable Enhanced Micropollutant Biodegradation.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Integrating Experiments and Models To Unravel Interactions between Soil Organic Matter and Enhanced Weathering.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Role of Advanced Direct Extraction Technologies in Reducing Environmental Impacts of Lithium Production.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of High Spatial Resolution PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> Estimates Using a Deep Ensemble Machine Learning Framework in a Low Pollution Setting.

Environmental science & technology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

Characterizing bioaerosol risk from environmental sampling.

Tao Hong1, Patrick L Gurian

  • 1Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States. hongtao510@gmail.com

Environmental Science & Technology
|May 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Environmental sampling after a biological agent release is crucial for risk assessment. This study recommends targeting specific particle sizes (3, 5, 10 μm) on surfaces like floors, walls, and HVAC filters for accurate risk estimation.

More Related Videos

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA
12:02

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
10:11

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures

Published on: May 7, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA
12:02

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
10:11

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures

Published on: May 7, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Microbiology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Effective environmental sampling is critical following a microbiological agent release to predict dispersion and human health risks.
  • Accurate risk assessment requires considering both the quantity and size distribution of aerosolized particles, as these affect dose-response and transport.
  • Conventional surface sampling methods often fail to differentiate particle sizes, limiting their utility in detailed risk assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different approaches for estimating health risks based on microorganism measurements from surface samples after an aerosol release.
  • To determine the level of detail realistically obtainable from surface sampling data for environmental assessments.
  • To identify an optimal sampling and modeling scheme for microbiological agent releases.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed various combinations of sampling surfaces, size fractions, HVAC conditions, spore size distributions, and measurement uncertainties.
  • Tested the accuracy of model predictions across different scenarios.
  • Evaluated the performance of a recommended sampling scheme using data from a large-scale field test.

Main Results:

  • A recommended scheme targets 3, 5, and 10 μm particles on untracked floors, walls, and HVAC filters.
  • This scheme provides reasonably accurate, albeit conservative, risk estimates for diverse scenarios.
  • Sample sizes of 10-25 per compartment suffice for order-of-magnitude risk estimates; larger sizes offer diminishing returns without improved recovery accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed sampling and modeling strategy offers a practical approach for risk assessment after aerosolized microbiological agent releases.
  • Optimizing surface sampling to include particle size information significantly enhances risk prediction accuracy.
  • Further improvements in sample recovery accuracy are needed to maximize the benefits of larger sample sizes.