Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

11:13
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Different groups, different motives: identity motives underlying changes in identification with novel groups
Matt Easterbrook1, Vivian L Vignoles
1School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. m.j.easterbrook@sussex.ac.uk
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|May 10, 2012
Summary
Motives for social identification differ based on group type. Identification with interpersonal networks is driven by self-esteem, belonging, and efficacy, while social categories rely on meaning, self-esteem, and distinctiveness.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Identity Research
Background:
- Social identification significantly impacts individuals and groups.
- Theoretical perspectives on the motives underlying social identification remain debated.
- Understanding these motives is crucial for explaining group behavior and cohesion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distinct motives driving identification with interpersonal networks versus social categories.
- To integrate motivated identity construction theory with contemporary social identity research.
- To examine how different motives predict changes in social identification over time.
Main Methods:
- A five-wave longitudinal study was conducted with 268 new university residents.
- Multilevel analyses were employed to examine within-person changes in social identification.
- Data collection focused on social identity processes and underlying motives.
Main Results:
- Identification with interpersonal networks (flatmates) was predicted by self-esteem, belonging, and efficacy motives.
- Identification with social categories (halls of residence) was predicted by meaning, self-esteem, and distinctiveness motives.
- Distinct motives were found to underlie identification with different types of social groups.
Conclusions:
- The study differentiates motives for identity enactment (interpersonal) versus identity definition (categorical).
- Findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of social identity formation and maintenance.
- Implications are discussed for future research on identity motives and social identity theory.
Related Concept Videos
Social Identity
Social identity constitutes a significant aspect of an individual’s self-concept, shaped by membership in various social groups, including gender, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and political affiliation. Individuals associate specific traits with particular social groups, leading to internalization of these traits. For example, musicians are often perceived as creative, while women are frequently associated with nurturing tendencies. Once individuals identify with a particular...
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Role-Based Identity
Role-based identities are central to understanding how individuals navigate social environments by adopting distinct self-conceptions aligned with various societal roles. These identities are not fixed traits but are constructed through personal actions and the social feedback individuals receive in context-specific interactions. Each social role, such as student, teacher, or friend, carries a set of expectations and norms that influence how people think, feel, and behave within that...
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status
James Marcia's identity status model provides a framework for understanding how adolescents navigate identity formation through varying degrees of exploration and commitment. Marcia's model builds on Erik Erikson's theories of psychosocial development, focusing specifically on how adolescents reconcile individual aspirations with societal expectations. His model describes identity formation as a dynamic process where adolescents move between different states depending on their level of...
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Cultural frameworks for understanding the self are often categorized into two broad orientations: individualism and collectivism. These paradigms influence how people define themselves, relate to others, and interpret their social worlds. Each orientation offers distinct perspectives on autonomy, responsibility, and the role of the individual within a community.Individualistic CulturesIn individualistic cultures like North America and Western Europe, identity is understood as autonomous and...
Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.

