Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
Published on: February 5, 2021
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
Suzanne de Waha1, Steffen Desch, Ingo Eitel
1Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, Strümpellstrasse 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. s-dw@gmx.net
Insights
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) offers no proven benefit for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without cardiogenic shock. Its use in STEMI with cardiogenic shock shows mixed results, necessitating further randomized trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a widely used left ventricular support device.
- Evidence for IABP in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with and without cardiogenic shock is reviewed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of IABP in STEMI patients.
- To analyze current literature regarding IABP use in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature, including randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses.
- Analysis of data from prospective and retrospective cohort studies.
Main Results:
- In high-risk STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock, IABP showed no significant efficacy benefit over standard treatment.
- IABP in STEMI with cardiogenic shock is guideline-recommended, with meta-analyses suggesting mortality reduction with thrombolysis but increased mortality with mechanical revascularization.
- Data for IABP in STEMI with cardiogenic shock are limited, primarily from non-randomized studies.
Conclusions:
- Current data do not support routine IABP use in high-risk STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock; consider as a bailout strategy.
- IABP use in STEMI with cardiogenic shock is recommended by guidelines, but recent meta-analyses challenge this, highlighting the need for robust randomized trials.
Abstract:
Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most widely used left ventricular support device in a variety of indications. This review focuses on the current literature and discusses the evidence of IABP in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with and without cardiogenic shock. In high-risk STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock several randomized clinical trials have been performed. The majority of the studies could not demonstrate an efficacy benefit for IABP as adjunctive therapy in comparison to standard treatment alone. Hence, recent meta-analyses could not reveal diverging mortality rates at a higher incidence of stroke and major bleedings with IABP use independent of the type of reperfusion therapy. IABP in STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock is recommended according to current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (AHA/ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. In recent meta-analyses, IABP in cardiogenic shock complicated by STEMI has been shown to be associated with decreased mortality. However, these beneficial effects are limited to patients treated with thrombolysis, whereas in patients undergoing mechanical revascularization IABP therapy is associated with an increase in mortality. Nevertheless, these data only arise from prospective and retrospective cohort studies, as up to date only one very small randomized clinical trial has been completed. In summary, in high-risk STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock, current data do not support the use of IABP and should only be considered as a standby and bailout strategy if patients develop haemodynamic instability. Current data on IABP in patients with cardiogenic shock complicated by STEMI are scarce and highly limited due to the nonrandomized design of previous trials. However, according to current AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines its use is recommended. Although recent meta-analyses challenge current AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines, adequately powered randomized studies are needed to elucidate the role of IABP in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...

