Is Myocardial Infarction in Patients without Significant Stenosis on a Coronary Angiogram as Benign as Believed?
Shi Hyun Rhew1, Youngkeun Ahn, Min Chul Kim
1Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Insights
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but without significant coronary artery stenosis had similar 1-year outcomes to those with stenosis. This finding holds true even when analyzing subgroups with cryptogenic causes versus identifiable factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients without significant coronary artery stenosis represent a distinct clinical subgroup.
- Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of this group is crucial for refining diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
- Comparison with AMI patients exhibiting significant coronary artery stenosis provides valuable insights into disease heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical characteristics of AMI patients without significant coronary artery stenosis.
- To compare the 1-year outcomes of AMI patients with and without significant coronary artery stenosis.
- To analyze outcomes within subgroups of non-significant stenosis based on underlying etiology.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,220 AMI patients.
- Classification into Group I (≥50% diameter stenosis) and Group II (<50% diameter stenosis).
- Subgrouping of Group II into cryptogenic (II-a) and possible causative factors (II-b), including vasospasm, myocardial bridge, and spontaneous thrombolysis.
Main Results:
- Group II patients were younger, more often women, and less likely to smoke or have diabetes compared to Group I.
- Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates at 1 and 12 months were not significantly different between Group I and Group II.
- Clinical outcomes, including MACE and mortality at 12 months, were similar between Group II-a and Group II-b, despite differences in NT-proBNP and hs-CRP levels.
Conclusions:
- AMI patients without significant coronary artery stenosis demonstrate comparable 1-year clinical outcomes to those with significant stenosis.
- Subgroup analysis reveals similar clinical outcomes between cryptogenic and identifiable causes of non-significant stenosis AMI.
- The findings suggest that non-obstructive coronary artery disease in AMI does not necessarily portend a worse prognosis.
Abstract:
The present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and 1-year outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients without significant stenosis on a coronary angiogram comparison with the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with significant coronary artery stenosis. A total of 1,220 patients with AMI were retrospectively classified into Group I (≥50% diameter stenosis, n=1,120) and Group II (<50%, n=100). Group II was further divided into two subgroups according to the underlying etiology: cryptogenic (Group II-a, n=54) and those with possible causative factors (Group II-b, n=46). Patients in Group II were younger, were more likely to be women, and were less likely to smoke and to have diabetes mellitus than were patients in Group I. The levels of cardiac enzymes, LDL-cholesterol levels, and the apo-B/A1 ratio were lower in Group II. However, 1-month and 12-month rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were not significantly different between the two groups. The Group II-b subgroup comprised 29 patients with vasospasm, 11 with myocardial bridge, and 6 with spontaneous thrombolysis. Left ventricular ejection fraction and creatinine clearance were lower and levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were higher in Group II-a than in Group II-b. However, outcomes including MACE and mortality at 12 months were not significantly different between the two subgroups. The 1-year outcomes of patients in Group II were similar to those of patients in Group I. The clinical outcomes in Group II-a were also similar to those of Group II-b, although the former group showed higher levels of NT-proBNP and hs-CRP.
Related Concept Videos
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management

