Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

A Modified Murine Heterotopic Heart Transplant Protocol Matching Contemporary Standards of Aseptic Technique, Anesthesia, and Analgesia
Published on: September 28, 2022
Hartmann's procedure or primary anastomosis?
Martin E Kreis1, Mario H Mueller, Wolfgang H Thasler
1Ludwig Maximilians University, Klinikum Grosshadern, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany. martin.kreis@med.uni-muenchen.de
Insights
For acute perforated diverticulitis surgery, primary anastomosis is often feasible. Hartmann
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Surgery
Background:
- Acute perforated diverticulitis necessitates surgical intervention.
- Classification systems like Hinchey and Hansen-Stock aid in diagnosis.
- Sigmoid colectomy is the standard surgical approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare primary anastomosis versus Hartmann procedure for perforated diverticulitis.
- To identify optimal surgical strategies based on patient condition and comorbidity.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on surgical management of perforated diverticulitis.
- Analysis of patient data to assess outcomes of different surgical procedures.
- Comparison of primary anastomosis with loop ileostomy versus Hartmann procedure.
Main Results:
- Primary anastomosis is feasible and safe for many patients, especially with a loop ileostomy.
- Hartmann's operation is recommended for severely ill patients with significant comorbidities.
- Patient condition and comorbidity are more critical decision factors than peritonitis extent.
Conclusions:
- Sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis is a viable option for selected patients.
- Hartmann's procedure offers safety for critically ill patients.
- Individualized patient assessment is crucial for optimal surgical decision-making in perforated diverticulitis.
Abstract:
Perforation following acute diverticulitis is a typical scenario during the first attack. Different classification systems exist to classify acute perforated diverticulitis. While the Hinchey classification, which is based on intraoperative findings, is internationally best known, the German Hansen-Stock classification which is based on CT scan is widely accepted within Germany. When surgery is necessary, sigmoid colectomy is the standard of care. An important question is whether patients should receive primary anastomosis or a Hartmann procedure subsequently. A priori there are several arguments for both procedures. Hartmann's operation is extremely safe and, therefore, represents the best option in severely ill patients and/or extensive peritonitis. However, this operation carries a high risk of stoma nonreversal, or, when reversal is attempted, a high risk in terms of morbidity and mortality. In contrast, primary anastomosis with or without loop ileostoma is a slightly more lengthy procedure as normally the splenic flexure needs to be mobilized and construction of the anastomosis may consume more time than the Hartmann operation. The big advantage of primary anastomosis, however, is that there is no need for the potentially risky stoma reversal operation. The most interesting question is when to do the Hartmann operation or primary anastomosis. Several comparative case series were published showing that primary anastomosis is feasible in many patients. However, no randomized trial is available to date. It is of note, that all non-randomized case series are biased, i.e. that patients in better condition received anastomosis and those with severe peritonitis underwent Hartmann's operation. This bias is undoubtedly likely to be present, even if not obvious, in the published papers! Our own data suggest that this decision should not be based on the extent of peritonitis but rather on patient condition and comorbidity. In conclusion, sigmoid colectomy and primary anastomosis is feasible and safe in many patients who need surgery for perforated diverticulitis, particularly when combined with loop ileostomy. Based on our own published analysis, however, we recommend performing Hartmann's operation in severely ill patients who carry substantial comorbidity, while the extent of peritonitis appears not to be of predominant importance.
