Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Early postoperative pelvic-floor biofeedback improves erectile function in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a
C Prota1, C M Gomes, L H S Ribeiro
1Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
International Journal of Impotence Research
|May 11, 2012
Summary
Pelvic-floor biofeedback training (PFBT) significantly improves erectile function (EF) recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients undergoing PFBT showed higher potency rates compared to controls, highlighting its benefit for sexual health post-surgery.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Sexual Medicine
- Rehabilitation
Background:
- Radical prostatectomy (RP) frequently leads to erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence.
- The efficacy of pelvic-floor biofeedback training (PFBT) for improving erectile function (EF) post-RP remains unclear.
- Urinary continence is a known complication, but its impact on potency recovery is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate the impact of PFBT on erectile function (EF) recovery in patients undergoing RP.
- To compare EF recovery rates between patients receiving PFBT and those in a control group.
- To investigate the association between urinary continence and potency recovery after RP.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-two patients undergoing RP were randomized into a PFBT group (3 months of weekly sessions and home exercises) or a control group (verbal instructions).
- Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) pre-surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery.
- Continence was defined as no pad usage; potency was defined as an IIEF-5 score >20.
Main Results:
- The PFBT group showed significantly higher potency recovery rates at 12 months (47.1%) compared to the control group (12.5%) (P=0.032).
- A strong association was observed between urinary continence and potency recovery, with continent patients being 5.4 times more likely to be potent (P=0.04).
- Both groups experienced a reduction in IIEF-5 scores post-surgery, but PFBT mitigated this decline.
Conclusions:
- Early PFBT demonstrates a significant positive impact on the recovery of erectile function following radical prostatectomy.
- Achieving urinary continence post-RP is a strong indicator for successful erectile function recovery.
- PFBT is a promising intervention for improving sexual health outcomes after RP.