Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the Inherent Toxicity Concept in Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2020
Same author

The regulatory challenge of chemicals in the environment: Toxicity testing, risk assessment, and decision-making models.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2018
Same author

Data quality and relevance in ecotoxicity: The undocumented influences of model assumptions and modifying factors on aquatic toxicity dose metrics.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2015
Same author

Are we in the dark ages of environmental toxicology?

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2013
Same author

Evaluation of critical body residue data for acute narcosis in aquatic organisms.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2013
Same author

The human relevant potency threshold: reducing uncertainty by human calibration of cumulative risk assessments.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2011
Same journal

The NTP Chronic Inhalation Study Does Not Support an Inherent Lung Cancer Hazard of Talc: Implications of Lung Particle Overload and Maximum Tolerated Dose.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Consideration of Carcinogenicity and Mode of Action Information by an Independent Expert Panel to Support Derivation of No-Significant-Risk-Level Values for Vinyl Acetate Monomer.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Which carcinogenicity study should I use? Automated identification of reliable studies.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Adoption of artificial intelligence in drug review across the lifecycle: Transformation of regulatory decision-making.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular outcomes following intrauterine and lactational exposure to cyantraniliprole in male Wistar rats.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Pesticide residue and mycotoxin occurrence in apples and their impact on human health in Morocco.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Model validation in aquatic toxicity testing: implications for regulatory practice.

L S McCarty1

  • 1L.S. McCarty Scientific Research & Consulting, 1115 Quaker Trail, Newmarket, ON, Canada L3X 3E2.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|May 15, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Acute toxicity testing protocols have flaws that compromise data validity. Quality control reveals issues with estimating median lethal concentrations (LC50s) and controlling toxicity factors, impacting regulatory applications.

More Related Videos

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances
08:18

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances

Published on: October 10, 2020

Protocol for Acute and Chronic Ecotoxicity Testing of the Turquoise Killifish Nothobranchius furzeri
09:43

Protocol for Acute and Chronic Ecotoxicity Testing of the Turquoise Killifish Nothobranchius furzeri

Published on: April 24, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances
08:18

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances

Published on: October 10, 2020

Protocol for Acute and Chronic Ecotoxicity Testing of the Turquoise Killifish Nothobranchius furzeri
09:43

Protocol for Acute and Chronic Ecotoxicity Testing of the Turquoise Killifish Nothobranchius furzeri

Published on: April 24, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Chemical Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Toxicity test validity relies on appropriate models and assumptions.
  • Acute toxicity testing, particularly median lethal concentration (LC50) determination, is crucial for regulatory assessments.
  • The US. EPA fathead minnow database is a key resource for evaluating aquatic toxicity testing protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a quality control evaluation of the acute toxicity testing protocol using the US. EPA fathead minnow database.
  • To assess the validity of LC50 estimations based on three key assumptions.
  • To identify limitations in current toxicity testing protocols and their impact on regulatory applications.

Main Methods:

  • Focused on three core assumptions for valid toxicological metrics: steady-state LC50 estimation, equivalent exposure durations, and control of toxicity modifying factors.
  • Evaluated approximately 8% of tests for failure to meet the first assumption (steady-state LC50 estimation).
  • Examined remaining data for variances due to unquantified toxicity modifying factors, assessing the third assumption.

Main Results:

  • Approximately 8% of the evaluated toxicity tests were found to be invalid and unusable due to failure to estimate steady-state LC50s.
  • Remaining tests failed to adequately control for substantive toxicity modifying factors, compromising data consistency and comparability.
  • Flaws in LC50 data impact quantitative applications like Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), mixture toxicity, and regulatory chemical grouping.

Conclusions:

  • Current LC50 testing protocols generate data with inherent uncertainties, affecting the reliability of toxicological metrics.
  • While current regulations accommodate this uncertainty through policy-driven guidance, quantitative applications are compromised.
  • A formal quality control review of LC50 protocols is justified, with interim improvements in design, execution, interpretation, and regulatory use of exposure-based dose surrogates recommended.