Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
Published on: November 30, 2022
Commonly performed procedures in clinical research: a benchmark for payment
Dinora Dominguez1, Mandy Jawara, Nicole Martino
1Office of Communications, Patient Recruitment, and Public Liaison, NIH Clinical Center, USA.
This study establishes payment benchmarks for clinical research participants using four years of data. The findings offer guidance for determining appropriate compensation for research participation, addressing a gap in current literature.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- Health Economics
- Research Ethics
Background:
- Clinical trial enrollment is often slow, necessitating effective participant recruitment strategies.
- Existing literature on compensating research participants primarily addresses ethical concerns, lacking practical guidelines for payment amounts.
- There is a need for data-driven benchmarks to assist investigators and IRBs in determining fair payment for clinical research participation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish payment benchmarks for commonly performed clinical research procedures.
- To provide data to guide investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) in setting participant compensation.
- To address the lack of established formulas or guidelines for calculating participant payments.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of four years of data (August 2004-August 2008) on inconvenience units assigned to clinical research procedures.
- Utilized data from 36,273 payment incidents at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center.
- Examined the value assigned to specific procedures to identify payment benchmarks.
Main Results:
- Identified payment benchmarks for various clinical research procedures based on assigned inconvenience units.
- Data analysis revealed a convergence in payment practices for most procedures, despite outliers.
- This study presents one of the first published reports on specific payment amounts for clinical research procedures.
Conclusions:
- The established payment benchmarks can inform investigators and IRBs when determining participant compensation.
- The findings support the development of payment standards for clinical research procedures.
- This data complements existing proposals for calculating participant payments based on time and procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Blind Procedures
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Ethics in Research

