Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice
Published on: February 2, 2014
Clinicians' opinions on new vaccination programs implementation
1Institut national de santé publique du Québec, 2400 d'Estimauville, Québec, Québec, Canada. eve.dube@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Abstract:
In Canada, several new vaccines were recently approved for clinical use or are expected to be soon. Decision-makers are faced with the choice whether or not to include these vaccines in publicly funded vaccination programs. The aim of this study was to assess Canadian pediatricians' and family physicians' opinions regarding 7 new vaccines, and perceived priority for the introduction of new programs. A self-administered, anonymous, mail-based questionnaire was sent during fall 2009 to a random sample of 1182 family physicians and to all 1852 Canadian pediatricians. Responses to 8 statements regarding frequency and severity of the diseases, efficacy and safety of the vaccines as well as feasibility of immunization programs were used to calculate priority scores to rank the 7 potential new vaccination programs (calculated scores ranging from 0 to 100). Overall response rate was 43%. The majority of respondents perceived the health and economic burden of diseases prevented by the seven new vaccines as important and considered new vaccines to be safe and effective. More than 90% of physicians strongly agreed or agreed that the new vaccines would be or are currently well accepted by the public and by the health professionals who administer vaccines, except for the HPV and rotavirus vaccines (respectively 30% and 29% strongly agreed or agreed). Mean priority scores were: 77.4 out of 100 for the measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) combined vaccine; 75.6 for the hexavalent (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HBV) vaccine; 73.1 for the new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines; 69.8 for the meningococcal ACYW135; 68.9 for the combined hepatitis A and B; 63.5 for the human papillomavirus vaccine and 56.9 for the rotavirus vaccine. Health professionals' opinion is an important element to consider in the decision-making process regarding implementation of new immunization programs. Without health professional support, the introduction of a new vaccination program may be unsuccessful. In this study, the MMRV and the hexavalent (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HBV) vaccines received the highest ratings.
Insights
Canadian physicians support new vaccines like MMRV and hexavalent, prioritizing them for public programs. Most new vaccines are seen as safe and effective, though acceptance varies for HPV and rotavirus vaccines.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Vaccinology
- Health Policy
Background:
- Several new vaccines are nearing approval or are already available in Canada.
- Decision-makers must determine which vaccines to fund in public vaccination programs.
- Physician opinions are crucial for successful new vaccine program implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate Canadian pediatricians' and family physicians' opinions on seven new vaccines.
- To assess the perceived priority for introducing new vaccination programs based on physician input.
Main Methods:
- A mail-based anonymous questionnaire was sent to 1182 family physicians and 1852 pediatricians in fall 2009.
- Physicians responded to statements on disease burden, vaccine efficacy, safety, and program feasibility.
- Priority scores (0-100) were calculated to rank the seven potential new vaccination programs.
Main Results:
- The majority of physicians viewed the diseases prevented by new vaccines as significant and considered the vaccines safe and effective.
- High agreement (over 90%) on public and professional acceptance was noted, except for HPV (30%) and rotavirus (29%) vaccines.
- Highest priority scores were for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccine (77.4) and hexavalent vaccine (75.6).
Conclusions:
- Physician perspectives are vital for the successful adoption of new immunization programs.
- The measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) and hexavalent vaccines received the highest priority ratings from healthcare professionals.
- Understanding health professional opinions is essential for informed decision-making regarding vaccine introductions.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Vaccines
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

