Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Diversity of Antigen Receptors01:28

Diversity of Antigen Receptors

Antigen receptors are essential components of the immune system crucial in defending the body against foreign invaders. These receptors are present on the surface of B and T cells, enabling them to recognize antigens and mount an appropriate immune response.
Before encountering any antigen, lymphocytes express these receptors. On B cells, the antigen receptor is a membrane-bound antibody molecule called BCR; on T cells, it is a T cell receptor or TCR. B and T cell receptors are composed of two...
Prokaryotic vs. Eukaryotic Cells01:28

Prokaryotic vs. Eukaryotic Cells

Prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells represent two fundamental types of cellular organization, differing significantly in structure, complexity, and function. These distinctions underpin the biological diversity seen across domains of life.Prokaryotic Cell CharacteristicsProkaryotic cells, exemplified by bacteria and archaea, are structurally simple and lack membrane-bound organelles, including a nucleus. Their genetic material consists of a single, circular DNA molecule in the nucleoid region,...
Naming Enantiomers02:21

Naming Enantiomers

The naming of enantiomers employs the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog rules that involve assigning priorities to different substituent groups at a chiral center. Each enantiomer, being a distinct molecule, is assigned a unique name by the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog (CIP) rules, also called the R–S system. The prefix R- or S- attached to the chiral centers in an enantiomer is dependent on the spatial arrangement of the four substituents on the chiral center. The R–S system essentially comprises three steps:...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Levels of Organization01:09

Levels of Organization

Biological organization is the classification of biological structures, ranging from atoms at the bottom of the hierarchy to the Earth's biosphere. Each level of the hierarchy represents an increase in complexity that builds upon the previous level.
Molecules Are Composed of Atoms, and Biomolecules Are Assembled from Molecules:
The most basic levels include atoms, molecules, and biomolecules. Atoms, the smallest unit of ordinary matter, are composed of a nucleus and electrons. Molecules...
Radical Reactivity: Intramolecular vs Intermolecular01:33

Radical Reactivity: Intramolecular vs Intermolecular

Radical reactions can occur either intermolecularly or intramolecularly. In an intermolecular radical reaction, a nucleophilic radical adds to an electrophilic alkene or vice versa. In such reactions, the radical and generally the alkene, which is also called the radical trap, are two different molecules. Additionally, for such intermolecular reactions to occur, the radical trap must be active, present in an excess concentration, and the radical starting material must have a weak carbon–halogen...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pre-existing antibody and T cell responses to SaCas9, AsCas12a and CasΦ are comparable in naïve individuals.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Hematological, inflammatory, and hypoxia-responsive adaptations to 18-day normobaric live high-train low training in elite rowers.

Frontiers in physiology·2026
Same author

Polylactide Modified with ZnO and Raspberry Leaf Extract as Active Food Packaging.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Tumor cell intrinsic mechanisms of immune escape.

Cell communication and signaling : CCS·2026
Same author

Bioactivity of Novel Colchicine, Colchiceine, and 10-Methylthiocolchicine Complexes with Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium Chlorides: Experimental and Theoretical Studies.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

AI-Enhanced Adaptive Virtual Screening Platform Enabling Exploration of 69 Billion Molecules Discovers Structurally Validated FSP1 Inhibitors.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

High-resolution Melting PCR for Complement Receptor 1 Length Polymorphism Genotyping: An Innovative Tool for Alzheimer's Disease Gene Susceptibility Assessment
07:26

High-resolution Melting PCR for Complement Receptor 1 Length Polymorphism Genotyping: An Innovative Tool for Alzheimer's Disease Gene Susceptibility Assessment

Published on: July 18, 2017

Domain organization differences explain Bcr-Abl's preference for CrkL over CrkII.

Wojciech Jankowski1, Tamjeed Saleh, Ming-Tao Pai

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.

Nature Chemical Biology
|May 15, 2012
PubMed
Summary

CrkL protein structure differs from its homolog CrkII, impacting signaling in leukemia. This distinct architecture explains CrkL

More Related Videos

A Guide to Production, Crystallization, and Structure Determination of Human IKK1/α
11:27

A Guide to Production, Crystallization, and Structure Determination of Human IKK1/α

Published on: November 2, 2018

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

High-resolution Melting PCR for Complement Receptor 1 Length Polymorphism Genotyping: An Innovative Tool for Alzheimer's Disease Gene Susceptibility Assessment
07:26

High-resolution Melting PCR for Complement Receptor 1 Length Polymorphism Genotyping: An Innovative Tool for Alzheimer's Disease Gene Susceptibility Assessment

Published on: July 18, 2017

A Guide to Production, Crystallization, and Structure Determination of Human IKK1/α
11:27

A Guide to Production, Crystallization, and Structure Determination of Human IKK1/α

Published on: November 2, 2018

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Signaling
  • Cancer Biology

Background:

  • CrkL is a signaling protein crucial for Bcr-Abl leukemogenesis.
  • CrkL shares similarities with CrkII, but has distinct physiological roles.
  • Understanding CrkL structure is key to deciphering its role in leukemia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the structures of CrkL and CrkII.
  • To investigate how structural differences affect protein function and regulation.
  • To elucidate the mechanism behind Bcr-Abl's preference for CrkL.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative structural analysis of CrkL and CrkII.
  • Investigation of Src homology 2 (SH2) and Src homology 3 (SH3) domain binding activities.
  • Analysis of CrkL complex formation with Abl.

Main Results:

  • CrkL and phosphorylated CrkL exhibit distinct structures compared to CrkII.
  • Differential regulation of SH2 and SH3 domain binding activities in CrkL vs. CrkII.
  • CrkL forms a constitutive complex with Abl, explaining Bcr-Abl's preference.

Conclusions:

  • Structural differences between CrkL and CrkII underpin their distinct functional roles.
  • CrkL's constitutive complex with Abl is critical for Bcr-Abl mediated leukemogenesis.
  • Adaptor protein domain organization critically controls cellular signaling outcomes.