Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
[Benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus]
C Hasselmann1, E Bonnemaison, N Faure
1Service de médecine pédiatrique, université François-Rabelais, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Insights
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) led to better glycemic control and fewer hospital admissions compared to multiple daily injections (MDI). This improved metabolic outcome was achieved without increasing severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Metabolic Disorders
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial highlighted the importance of blood glucose control in preventing long-term complications of type 1 diabetes (T1D).
- Intensive insulin therapy, using either multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), is key to achieving glycemic control in T1D.
- Comparing the efficacy of CSII and MDI in pediatric T1D populations is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in managing glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study comparing 38 T1D children using CSII with 38 T1D children using MDI, matched for age, gender, and diabetes duration.
- Data collected included insulin dosage, HbA1c levels, BMI, and severe hypoglycemia/admission rates over a 3-year follow-up period.
- Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in glycemic control and complication rates between the CSII and MDI groups.
Main Results:
- Children treated with CSII demonstrated significantly lower HbA1c levels (7.5% vs. 8.0%) and reduced hospital admission rates (0.07 vs. 0.17 events/patient/year) compared to those on MDI.
- CSII group required lower daily insulin doses (0.78 vs. 0.87 IU/kg/d).
- No significant differences were observed in body mass index or severe hypoglycemia episodes between the groups; no diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in either cohort.
Conclusions:
- Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) offers superior metabolic control in children with type 1 diabetes compared to multiple daily injections (MDI).
- CSII therapy can achieve better glycemic outcomes with lower insulin doses and without an increased risk of acute complications.
- These findings support CSII as an effective treatment option for pediatric T1D management.
Background:
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial clearly demonstrated the benefits of blood glucose control, especially in children and adolescents, in the prevention of long-term complications of type 1 diabetes (T1D). This can be achieved with intensive insulin treatment with either multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), also known as insulin pump. The aim of this study was to compare glycemic control of T1D children treated with either CSII or MDI.
Patients And Methods:
Thirty-eight T1D children treated with CSII were compared to 38 children treated with MDI, matched for age, gender, and duration of diabetes. Collected data, including daily doses of insulin in IU/kg/d, HbA1c levels, body mass index expressed in standard deviation/age, number of severe hypoglycemia episodes and of admissions related to T1D expressed in events/patient/year, were retrospectively collected every 3 months.
Results:
There was no difference between the 2 groups at baseline. During the 3 years of follow-up, patients treated with CSII had lower daily doses of insulin (0.78 ± 0.19 vs. 0.87 ± 0.22 IU/kg/d, p<0.05), significantly lower levels of HbA1c (7.5 ± 0.6 vs. 8.0 ± 1.3 %, p<0.05), and a decreased number of admissions related to T1D (0.07 ± 0.14 vs. 0.17 ± 0.22 events/patient/year, p<0.05) than children treated with MDI. In contrast, body mass index and number of severe hypoglycemic episodes did not differ between the two groups. No diabetic ketoacidosis episode was recorded in either group.
Conclusion:
The results from this study suggest that treatment with CSII provided better metabolic control than treatment with MDI, in spite of lower daily doses of insulin and without increasing acute complications, in children with T1D.
More Related Videos
08:32Studying the Hypothalamic Insulin Signal to Peripheral Glucose Intolerance with a Continuous Drug Infusion System into the Mouse Brain
Published on: January 4, 2018
05:23Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into rapid-acting...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Type I Diabetes I: Introduction
Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Continuous-Release Systems