Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026
01:22
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
846
Influence of baseline left ventricular function on the clinical outcome of surgical ventricular reconstruction in
Jae K Oh1, Eric J Velazquez, Lorenzo Menicanti
1Mayo Clinic, Gonda 6 South, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN, USA. oh.jae@mayo.ed
European Heart Journal
|May 16, 2012
Summary
Surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) offers no overall benefit for ischemic heart failure. However, patients with less dilated left ventricles (LV) and better ejection fraction (EF) may benefit from SVR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial found no overall survival benefit for adding surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy patients often have impaired left ventricular (LV) function, necessitating further investigation into potential benefits of SVR in specific subgroups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether baseline left ventricular (LV) function parameters can identify subgroups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who may benefit from SVR when added to CABG.
- To analyze the impact of LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) and ejection fraction (EF) on outcomes in the STICH trial.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 710 patients from the STICH trial with adequate baseline LV function data from echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, or radionuclide imaging.
- Assessment of the relationship between LV function parameters (ESVI, EF, regional wall motion abnormalities) and patient outcomes using various imaging modalities and algorithms.
Main Results:
- Patients with smaller LVESVI (<60 mL/m2) and better LVEF (≥33%) showed potential benefit from SVR, as indicated by echocardiographic measures.
- Patients with larger LVESVI (>90 mL/m2) and poorer LVEF (≤25%) appeared to have worse outcomes with SVR.
- The extent of regional wall motion abnormalities did not influence the effects of SVR; algorithms using multiple imaging modalities showed weaker correlations between global LV function and SVR outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Subgroup analyses of the STICH trial suggest that SVR may benefit patients with less dilated left ventricles and better ejection fraction.
- Conversely, patients with larger left ventricles and poorer ejection fraction may experience adverse effects from SVR.
- These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies based on specific LV function parameters in ischemic cardiomyopathy.