Correlation among the Visual Gait Assessment Scale, Edinburgh Visual Gait Scale and Observational Gait Scale in

Geruza P Bella1, Nádia B B Rodrigues, Paola J Valenciano

  • 1Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. geruzaperlatobella@gmail.com

Insights

The Visual Gait Assessment Scale (VGAS) and Edinburgh Visual Gait Scale (EVGS) show good agreement for assessing spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (CP) gait in children, unlike the Observational Gait Scale (OGS).

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Neurology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Gait disorders are prevalent in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (CP).
  • Instrumented gait analysis is crucial for quantifying intervention outcomes in CP.
  • Objective assessment tools are needed to evaluate gait improvements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the correlation between the Edinburgh Visual Gait Scale (EVGS), Visual Gait Assessment Scale (VGAS), and Observational Gait Scale (OGS).
  • To identify the most reliable visual gait assessment tool for children with spastic diplegia CP.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study involving 8 children with spastic diplegia CP (GMFCS Level I-II).
  • Gait analysis performed using EVGS, VGAS, and OGS by three examiners.
  • Data analyzed using Weighted Kappa scores to assess inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Main Results:

  • Moderate to excellent intra-rater agreement (k=0.41-1.00) was observed between the scales.
  • VGAS and EVGS demonstrated the highest agreement for classifying children's gait.
  • OGS showed considerable disagreement when compared to VGAS and EVGS.

Conclusions:

  • VGAS and EVGS are more suitable for assessing gait in children with spastic diplegia CP.
  • OGS may be less reliable for this specific patient population.
  • These findings support the use of VGAS and EVGS in clinical practice and research for CP gait.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos