Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
Published on: March 12, 2021
Hip range of motion in children: what is the norm?
Wudbhav N Sankar1, Christopher T Laird, Keith D Baldwin
1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. sankarw@gmail.com
Background:
Abnormal range of motion (ROM) is a common sign of pathology in the pediatric hip, yet there are little data in the literature defining what the normal hip ROM is in children. The purpose of this study was to establish normative values for hip ROM in children of varying ages.
Methods:
We performed an Institutional Review Board approved, prospective study of otherwise healthy patients receiving fracture care at our institution. Inclusion criteria were boys and girls aged 2 to 17, who were being treated for an isolated upper extremity injury and who had no underlying musculoskeletal condition, history of lower extremity injury, or other systemic diagnosis. All patients were evaluated with a standard measurement technique using the same double-long-armed goniometer. Supine abduction, adduction, and hip flexion were measured with care taken to stabilize the pelvis. Internal and external rotation in flexion were assessed with both the hip and knee flexed to 90 degrees. In the prone position, hip extension was recorded as was internal and external rotation in extension. Left and right measurements were averaged to produce a single data point for each index. On the basis of a power analysis (to detect a minimal detectable difference of 6 degrees), 2 separate cohorts of 23 patients were randomly selected for the assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reliability.
Results:
We measured 504 hips in 252 pediatric patients, including 163 boys and 89 girls. We found a decreasing trend in ROM for almost all indices with advancing age, although this decline was less apparent among girls. Intraobserver reliability demonstrated excellent agreement (intra class correlation coefficient>0.81) for all indices. Interobserver assessments revealed excellent agreement for abduction, external rotation in flexion, internal rotation in extension, and external rotation in extension. Substantial agreement (intra class correlation coefficient, 0.61 to 0.8) was found for adduction, flexion, extension, and internal rotation in flexion.
Conclusions:
Normative values for hip ROM in children of varying ages have been established with acceptable intraobserver and interobserver reliability.
Level Of Evidence:
Level II (Diagnostic).
Related Concept Videos
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height of...
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Range
15.9; 16.1; 15.2; 14.8; 15.8; 15.9; 16.0; 15.5
Measurements of the amount of soda in a 16-ounce can vary since different subjects record these measurements or since the exact amount - 16 ounces of liquid, was not...
Applications of Normal Distribution
The heights of 15 to 18-year-old males from Chile from 1984 to 1985 followed a normal distribution. The mean height is 172.36...
Anatomical Movements
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist, metacarpophalangeal,...
Midrange
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to outliers and...
